[gentoo-dev] Last rites: Last rites: www-apps/net2ftp

2008-10-31 Thread Gunnar Wrobel
Hi, www-apps/net2ftp will be removed for security reasons in 30 days. See bug #212368 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212368). Gunnar -- Gunnar WrobelGentoo Developer __C_o_n_t_a_c_t__ Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW:

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: Last rites: www-apps/moregroupware

2008-10-31 Thread Gunnar Wrobel
Hi, www-apps/moregroupware will be removed for security reasons in 30 days. See bug #212247 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212247). Gunnar -- Gunnar WrobelGentoo Developer __C_o_n_t_a_c_t__ Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW:

[gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Doug Goldstein
Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by default? Especially after a long time of kerberos not having a maintainer (thanks mueli for joining the Gentoo club and maintaining it now). Our current maintainer is working his butt off to get it up to speed but it's not there

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in app-mobilephone/smstools: ChangeLog smstools-2.2.20.ebuild

2008-10-31 Thread Tony Chainsaw Vroon
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:18 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: Remember pkg_preinst is called after src_install. Right, I'll change that back. It got in my way during unpack cycles. BTW: ROOT should be respected in pkg_postinst too. I'll add that. Regards, Tony V. signature.asc Description: This

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in app-mobilephone/smstools: ChangeLog smstools-2.2.20.ebuild

2008-10-31 Thread Torsten Veller
* Tony Vroon (chainsaw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- smstools-2.2.20.ebuild14 Jan 2008 16:13:37 - 1.1 +++ smstools-2.2.20.ebuild31 Oct 2008 15:49:29 - 1.2 -pkg_setup() { - enewgroup sms - enewuser smsd -1 -1 /var/spool/sms sms -} -

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Marius Mauch
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by default? AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for joining a Windows domain (same for the ldap flag). If no one opposes, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Doug Goldstein
Marius Mauch wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by default? AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for joining a Windows domain (same for the

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by default? AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: Marius Mauch wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by default? AFAIK it was added so that the default profile

[gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 pre-stabilization

2008-10-31 Thread Ryan Hill
In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with 4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near future if at all possible. Stabilizing this version is going to be a huge job due to the number of

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Doug Goldstein
Dawid Węgliński wrote: On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: Marius Mauch wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by default? AFAIK

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:41:26 Doug Goldstein wrote: Dawid Węgliński wrote: On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: Marius Mauch wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone remind me again why we have the

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Michael Hammer
* Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081031 15:53]: If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ greets, mueli p.S.: thx for the suggestion cardoe! -- Michael Hammer|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Graz, AT Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs

2008-10-31 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, I want to devote more time to the kernel project and other things, so I'm looking for people or herds to take ebuild maintainership of the following packages: dev-dotnet/gsf-sharp dev-dotnet/evolution-sharp dev-util/rej net-wireless/zd1211-firmware sys-block/viaideinfo sys-fs/udftools

[gentoo-dev] virtual/tetex removed

2008-10-31 Thread Ulrich Mueller
As announced beginning of September, the tetex virtual was finally removed. See bug 222501 for details. Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Joe Peterson
Michael Hammer wrote: * Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081031 15:53]: If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely approve of nuking it. -Joe

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Michael Hammer wrote: * Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081031 15:53]: If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely approve of nuking it. I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Mart Raudsepp wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Michael Hammer wrote: * Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081031 15:53]: If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely approve of nuking

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: Mart Raudsepp wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Michael Hammer wrote: * Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081031 15:53]: If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ I was also wondering

Re: [gentoo-dev] Flags to punt (including: kerberos USE flag)

2008-10-31 Thread Josh Saddler
Mart Raudsepp wrote: I'm believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's. They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=kerberos They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get things like GRP packages to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Flags to punt (including: kerberos USE flag)

2008-10-31 Thread Olivier Crête
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote: mikmod - Seriously, how many folks make it a habit to listen to .MOD music all the time? Even netlabels like Monotonik, which started *out* as .mod, make it harder to find their old .mod stuff. Agree ldap - Punt for the same reasons