can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on
their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 16 October 2008 03:27:29 Duft Markus wrote:
Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex.
It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I though
about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and
dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the same for
On Monday 06 October 2008 16:07:14 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Does it *really* matter if these under-staffed odd arches
have a stable tree or not? If there is a problem with a stable package
right now, will there be a new version marked stable in a reasonable
amount of time? I think we can conclude
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on
their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay
-mike
I pulled the latest git sources about a week ago and seemed like I hit a
regression in the
On Sunday 07 December 2008 04:41:09 C. Bergström wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin
on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay
I pulled the latest git sources about a week
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:44:40 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hadn't heard of it before, thanks for the ref. What was the reason
for forking the codebase? It gets pretty annoying to copy across
useful changes, especially while eselect is stuck in svn.
Ease of getting things
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on
their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
Thanks for looking after this important package. 1.3.2 isn't in CVS, did
you mean 1.3.1?
Daniel
On Sunday 07 December 2008 12:34:29 Daniel Drake wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin
on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
Thanks for looking after this important package. 1.3.2 isn't in CVS, did
you mean
ive gone through all the pending gcc-4.3.2 stuff that i see. if i missed a
bug (that has a fix readily available), then let me know soonish ... i'll be
pushing gcc-4.3.2-r1 in a bit.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-12-07 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-sound/cantus 2008-12-01 06:16:47 ssuominen
media-sound/workman 2008-12-01 06:16:47 ssuominen
www-apps/phpcollab
On P, 2008-12-07 at 12:03 +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
vapier 08/12/07 12:03:34
Modified: libxml2-2.7.2-r1.ebuild
ChangeLog entires are mandatory without any exceptions for
stabilizations. Don't touch packages I co-maintain without a ChangeLog
entry if it's not a
On P, 2008-12-07 at 12:07 +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
vapier 08/12/07 12:07:53
Modified: libIDL-0.8.10.ebuild
ChangeLog entires are mandatory without any exceptions for
stabilizations. Don't touch packages I co-maintain without a ChangeLog
entry if it's not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following the processing of wltjr's retirement, the following packages
have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some love. You
know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please add
yourself to the metadata.xml.
13 matches
Mail list logo
