[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do?

2008-12-24 Thread Steve Long
Fabian Groffen wrote: On 20-12-2008 05:35:25 +, Steve Long wrote: I note that bash-3.2_p17-r1 is stable on all the architectures that 3.0-r12 lists (it just adds the two -fbsd archs as unstable.) portage-2.1.4.5 requires at least that version (only unstable on mips as against 2.1.1-r2)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: what happened to /etc/init.d/hal{d,daemon,whatever} script ?

2008-12-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:19:06 -0600 Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote: Take a look for yourself and you will see why there has never been a table or anything created. (it is trivial - and you have the source on your computer already) It's even trivialler than you think. If it's an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: what happened to /etc/init.d/hal{d,daemon,whatever} script ?

2008-12-24 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2008/12/23 Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org: Looks like people have been truly over-zealous when removing die statements from ebuilds lately. I've added back to HAL an assortment of die statements. I hope this hasn't happened in too many other ebuilds. Maybe then someone should take a look

[gentoo-dev] List of ebuild functions that die/do not die

2008-12-24 Thread Thomas Sachau
As it seems like noone else is doing something about it, i have started a list with some entries[1]. Please send me more functions and their place and error reports directly to me (via mail or irc). [1]: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tommy/ebuild-functions.txt -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] List of ebuild functions that die/do not die

2008-12-24 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: As it seems like noone else is doing something about it, i have started a list with some entries[1]. Please send me more functions and their place and error reports directly to me (via mail or irc). I thought that the

Re: [gentoo-dev] List of ebuild functions that die/do not die

2008-12-24 Thread Doug Goldstein
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: As it seems like noone else is doing something about it, i have started a list with some entries[1]. Please send me more functions and their place and error reports directly to me (via mail or

Re: [gentoo-dev] List of ebuild functions that die/do not die

2008-12-24 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: [snip] commands that die: everything that is implemented as a function (ebuild.sh, eclasses, etc) [snip] Technically the rule is that eclasses shouldn't die. At least that's the latest version of

[gentoo-dev] Re: List of ebuild functions that die/do not die

2008-12-24 Thread Steve Long
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: [snip] commands that die: everything that is implemented as a function (ebuild.sh, eclasses, etc) [snip] Technically the rule is that eclasses shouldn't die. At least

[gentoo-dev] Removal of net-misc/udhcp will break systems

2008-12-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Not sure where to report this. net-misc/udhcp got masked recently with following notice: - net-misc/udhcp-0.9.9_pre20041216-r4 (masked by: package.mask) /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: # Diego Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2008) # Mask these for removal, busybox provides

Re: [gentoo-dev] Time to say goodbye

2008-12-24 Thread Daniel Black
Thanks for all your great work over the years. Much appreciated. Best wishes for whatever you end up doing. -- Daniel Black dragonhe...@gentoo.org Gentoo Foundation