Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of cp -i to prevent overwriting upstream files

2009-01-21 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 20/01/2009 в 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: So do you think: a) cp -i is fine No, interactivity is bad. b) this function should be added to eutils c) keep it restricted to java eclasses I don't remember/know any other cases where this function can be useful. So I think it's better

Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of cp -i to prevent overwriting upstream files

2009-01-21 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El mar, 20-01-2009 a las 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty escribió: d) something else e) use a hook around unpack on your local system to detect new build.xml for a list of packages. AFAIK, checking changes is part of the bump process, so I think that's a check you can do either at hand, with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] QEMU Sick!

2009-01-21 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Thursday 22 of January 2009 00:28:40 Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote: [[snip]] You should use more exclamation marks. Going to Funtoo! Good night, sleep tide... Enjoy. * qemu requires gcc-3 in order to build and work correctly * please compile it switching to gcc-3. * We

Re: [gentoo-dev] QEMU Sick!

2009-01-21 Thread Josh Saddler
Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote: [Rant rant rant] 1. Stop bitching. 2. Go away. (Not necessarily in that order.) Oh, and by the way: - No serious Gentoo-Wiki - rewritten after great boom! Guess what? We don't own that. We don't control it. It has no affiliation with Gentoo; it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] QEMU Sick!

2009-01-21 Thread Friedrich Oslage
Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote: Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) id ABDDD64A4E; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:36:12 + (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:28:40 +0100 You might want to run `ntpdate pool.ntp.org`...

[gentoo-dev] QEMU Sick!

2009-01-21 Thread Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org)
Now I'm pissed off! Am I so stupid to build GCC3 now? Qemu can be build with GCC 4 (exc. 4.3.2). Im tired about complaining pseudo developers about taking some ideas not needed by anyone. What don't working in Gentoo: - intel driver (i965) with connection to MESA - some not available video

[gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22

2009-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC). If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed to show up, then show up

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22

2009-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:35 Wed 21 Jan , Donnie Berkholz wrote: This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC). If you're supposed to show up, please show

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2009-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 07:23 Thu 08 Jan , Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Does anyone have additional topics for the Jan 22 meeting? Could you cover the PMS/documentation issue of bug 250077? Or, if you prefer to generalise, set up a procedure to resolve such conflicts?

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22

2009-01-21 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Donnie Berkholz wrote: This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC). If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed

Re: [gentoo-dev] QEMU Sick!

2009-01-21 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) mateuszmierzwin...@o2.pl wrote: Now I'm pissed off! Yeah I know the feeling, but after almost 7 years I'm still using Gentoo. Why? 'Cos it keep my brain working. Ubuntu is great, but it does everything on it's own. Then, you

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22

2009-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:28 Wed 21 Jan , Jeremy Olexa wrote: Can we get a consensus on bash version in the tree? this thread[1] is unresolved. I understand that the PMS draft is not set in stone (or something), but please...let's progress and update the spec[2]. I feel that this makes it hard for other

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sci-chemistry/gromacs: gromacs-3.3.3.ebuild gromacs-4.0.3.ebuild ChangeLog gromacs-4.0.ebuild gromacs-3.3.1-r1.ebuild gromacs-4.0.2.ebuild

2009-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 04:14 Thu 22 Jan , Jeffrey Gardner (je_fro) wrote: Index: gromacs-4.0.3.ebuild if ( use double-precision ) ; then What is this pointless subshell doing? There's heavy use of subshells throughout this ebuild for no reason. I quoted them below when I saw them.

Re: [gentoo-dev] QEMU Sick!

2009-01-21 Thread Dale
Norberto Bensa wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) mateuszmierzwin...@o2.pl wrote: Now I'm pissed off! Yeah I know the feeling, but after almost 7 years I'm still using Gentoo. Why? 'Cos it keep my brain working. Ubuntu is great, but it