On 23:35 Sat 31 Jan , Alec Warner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Donnie Berkholz
> wrote:
> > Yes, it would be a good idea to put expectations wherever people find
> > our contact info. Here's roughly what they are:
One other thing. Media requests will get quick responses.
> I'l
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-02-01 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-wireless/iwlwifi2009-01-27 16:37:23 pva
x11-misc/goats 2009-01-29 22:15:49 eva
dev-dotnet/jscall-sharp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Mike Auty (1 Feb 2009)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Old and unmaintained.
# Vmware herd has no access to the product, and it's
# for a very old version. See bug 143232.
app-emulation/vmware-esx-console
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn
Le 01/02/2009 18:32, Norberto Bensa a écrit :
Excuse me for thread hijack.
Would it make sense to add (for example):
gnome-games
gnome-games is already the name of a package that contains all official
GNOME games. Only a handful are also released and packaged separately.
Useless for us
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Excuse me for thread hijack.
Would it make sense to add (for example):
kde-games
gnome-games
?
Or the other way around. Move kde-base/kmail to mail-client/kmail ?
What about both ways using symlinks: kde-games/ksudoku -> games-puzzle/ksudoku ?
Thanks,
Norberto
Pe
Excuse me for thread hijack.
Would it make sense to add (for example):
kde-games
gnome-games
?
Or the other way around. Move kde-base/kmail to mail-client/kmail ?
What about both ways using symlinks: kde-games/ksudoku -> games-puzzle/ksudoku ?
Thanks,
Norberto
Richard Freeman schrieb:
> Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
>>
>
> I was thinking the same thing - this is a stable package, so ideally it
> shouldn't be "replaced" with an unstable one. Why not keep -0.4 in the
> tree for stable users?
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
>>
>
> I was thinking the same thing - this is a stable package, so ideally it
> shouldn't be "replaced" with an unstable one. Why not keep -0.4 in the
> tree for stable users?
+
+# Peter Alfredsen (1 Feb 2009)
+# Masked for removal in 30 days. Old and unmaintained. Upstream is gone.
+# Does not work with current ipod-sharp versions, see 195746. This
+# removes half of its functionality.
+# Is faily, see bug 256473.
+media-sound/monopod
+
Le Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:54:07 -0800
Donnie Berkholz a écrit:
> I need to tighten my focus so I can have a larger impact upon Gentoo
> with the time I have. To that end, I'm stopping maintenance of these
> packages, which are available for anyone to take:
>
> app-misc/colordiff
> app-shells/fish
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
I was thinking the same thing - this is a stable package, so ideally it
shouldn't be "replaced" with an unstable one. Why not keep -0.4 in the
tree for stable users?
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
Markus Ullmann wrote:
> +# Markus Ullmann (31 Jan 2009)
> +# Mask for removal in 30 days (found its way into mainline kde as
> kde-base/ksudoku)
> +games-puzzle/ksudoku
> +
>
Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digit
13 matches
Mail list logo
