[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

2009-02-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:51:14 -0600 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill > wrote: > > All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing > > header) patches will be applied by me in the coming week. If you > > have concerns about me touching your package (

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation

2009-02-10 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:55:41AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: >> All that I can say right now is that I recall questions about it in >> the past from overlay maintainers (I don't have a list) and the >> funtoo project is the only o

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

2009-02-10 Thread Serkan Kaba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Olexa yazmış: > Surely, at this point we aren't going to let all those bugs hold up > gcc-4.3 stabilization? Most of which were only found via Diego's > tinderboxing which implies that no user cares enough about the package > to report a bug (or

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

2009-02-10 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing header) > patches will be applied by me in the coming week. If you have concerns > about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my hands first), > please let me know. > > As alw

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: midnight commander -> which screen library

2009-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 03:26:34 Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 10.02.2009, 02:02 +0200 schrieb Petteri Räty: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Monday 09 February 2009 13:32:24 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > >> Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > >>> @mc.o (*1) we're currently discussing which s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can't format floppy or write to it...

2009-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
in addition to the points Josh made, please do not hijack threads -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation

2009-02-10 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > So... flame away. When I first read Zac's original email, I was sure that a change was required, and I'm sure now as well (I personally find the cache stuff pretty clunky). However, I think that a time has come for more *radical* change to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation

2009-02-10 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:55:41AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > All that I can say right now is that I recall questions about it in > the past from overlay maintainers (I don't have a list) and the > funtoo project is the only one which I can name offhand. > > However, the ability to distribute cach

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: midnight commander -> which screen library

2009-02-10 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 10.02.2009, 02:02 +0200 schrieb Petteri Räty: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 09 February 2009 13:32:24 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> Enrico Weigelt wrote: > >>> @mc.o (*1) we're currently discussing which screen library to keep. > >>> Either ncurses or slang will be dropped