[gentoo-dev] Time to remove app-shells/bash-completion-config

2009-02-17 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Hello, I would like to request that bash-completion-20081218 to be marked stable by the arches soon here. In doing so, I'm going to make the following change to bash-completion.eclass: -RDEPEND=bash-completion? - ( || ( - app-admin/eselect -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Time to remove app-shells/bash-completion-config

2009-02-17 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 11:55 Tue 17 Feb , Jeremy Olexa wrote: We should only be using eselect now to enable bash-completion. I think bash-completion-config is broken now anyway (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253878). So, after this change, I will p.mask b-c-c for removal. Any concerns? The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Time to remove app-shells/bash-completion-config

2009-02-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:27:24 -0600 Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote: This is not a fault of bash-completion but rather the eselect bash-completion module itself. Since our eselect team is defunct, I will mask the bash-completion USE flag for app-admin/eselect unless someone steps up to

Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs is now banned

2009-02-17 Thread Thilo Bangert
Thomas Anderson gentoofa...@gentoo.org said: Hi Everyone, This is a note that in the council meeting on 02/12/2009 the function 'prepalldocs' is banned for use in ebuilds with EAPIs 0 1 and 2. If you want some functionality from this function, please propose a new function or

Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs is now banned

2009-02-17 Thread Michael Sterrett
Why would people want to blindly remove prepalldocs when it clearly results in an inferior build of the package? Take the recent change to the (already marked stable) gnupg-2.0.9.ebuild as an example: Before: $ epm -qi gnupg | grep Size Size: 2845754 $ epm -qi gnupg | grep Size Size

Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs is now banned

2009-02-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:10:33 -0500 Michael Sterrett mr_bon...@gentoo.org wrote: So everybody who emerges gnupg since this change is wasting space for no good reason. If you care about a couple of hundred kilobytes, relying upon individual ebuilds to ask the package manager to compress

Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs is now banned

2009-02-17 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:18:06 + Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:10:33 -0500 Michael Sterrett mr_bon...@gentoo.org wrote: So everybody who emerges gnupg since this change is wasting space for no good reason. If you care about a couple of

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] missing-rebuild package set

2009-02-17 Thread Alec Warner
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lucian Poston wrote: The following patchs add a library dependency rebuilder as a package set, @missing-rebuild, to portage-2.2_rc6. Similar to the --library flag in