This patch removes the functionality within java-utils-2.eclass to
record and pass to java-config old style virtuals.
This functionality is not utilized within any repo that I know about and
is _most probably_ horribly broken anyway.
_ALL_ ebuilds that are using this functionality (aka 0) should i
Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm tired of playing, as I'm sure you are. So please,
let's be quiet now, and let the big people talk.
This is a public list designed to facilitate discussion of gentoo
software development. Anybody with something constructive to say is
more than welcome to speak up - part
Disclaimer - I too am not a lawyer.
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
I'm not a lawyer so I can't say for sure some software _need_ explicit
license acceptance to be used. However, I'm quite sure using a software
means accept the license.
Someone experienced in this area is welcome for clarifications.
We
On Fri, 29 May 2009 23:49:26 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Friday 29 May 2009 04:12:04 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > but ever consider that the reason people keep
> > repeating things to you is that you continually misunderstand what they're
> > saying?
> I'd say it is more
Alec Warner wrote:
> Lets agree to disagree on the definition of "technical" then and
> instead agree that putting EAPI in the filename is a bad design
> decision ("technicalness" aside) and then have a beer!
Wow. That's a *great* idea! ;)
-Cheers, Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 17:00 -0700 schrieb Josh Saddler:
>> AllenJB wrote:
>>> I'd favor tags over increasing the category
>>> levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
>>> (tho tags might make
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>> It looks like some licenses need acceptance.
> I prefer the wording: some software vendors claim that their licenses
> must be accepted to use the software. I'm not aware of any law which
> requires a license to use software - at least not inside
