On 01-07-2009 22:00:23 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
On behalf of the Elections project, the next Gentoo Council will be
composed of:-
Ned Ludd (solar)
Petteri Räty (betelgeuse)
Denis Dupeyron(calchan)
Tobias Scherbaum (dertobi123)
Ulrich Müller
If there are no further objections, and if I have the OK from Jorge i'll
commit the following tonight (name: 2009-07-02-kdeprefix+monolithics.en.txt).
Btw is it possible the following message to be uploaded in gentoo.org main
site as well?
Also, you can send me translations, see
Hallo,
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org:
If there are no further objections, and if I have the OK from Jorge
i'll commit the following tonight
Fine by me.
Also, you can send me translations
So you will provide Greek I assume. Here comes German.
Title: kdeprefix and monolithic
On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:27:34 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hallo,
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org:
If there are no further objections, and if I have the OK from Jorge
i'll commit the following tonight
Fine by me.
Also, you can send me translations
So you will provide
Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Ned Luddso...@gentoo.org wrote:
Meetings will likely go back to one time per month and be +m with +v be
handed out per request with open chat pre/post meetings. The reason for
this is to keep the meetings on-track. I won't engage in endless
There's a lot of good stuff to think about here. For what it's worth,
some initial comments.
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 19:33 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
Why would you vote for somebody who did not even publish a manifesto?
I don't
Ned Ludd wrote:
The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to vote.
But what about the rest of the year? What happens when the person you
voted for sucks? You are mostly powerless to do anything other than be
really vocal in what seems like a never ending battle. That needs
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Tobias Scherbaumdertobi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to vote.
But what about the rest of the year? What happens when the person you
voted for sucks? You are mostly powerless to do anything
Alec Warner wrote:
What I'd like to see for sure is a formal rule on who can decide to
modify or change parts of glep 39. As it's the council's constitution
somehow, we have two options from my pov (besides that a former council
did decide the council itself can change it's rules):
- a
Mike Frysinger wrote:
here's an item that should be relatively quick to address: fix the typo in
GLEP 39 where this line is missing (it's been in the council homepage
forever):
Only Gentoo developers may be nominated
I'd like to add that requirement for proxies as well. Varied
Ned Ludd a écrit :
[snip, lots of insightful stuff I either agree with or don't really
understand]
So lets have some damn fun again !...@#$
_That_ I whole heartedly agree with. Please, all of you in the new
council, try to keep this in mind :)
Thanks
Rémi
* Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org:
The full ranked list of candidates, in order, is:-
solar
betelgeuse
calchan
dertobi123
ulm
leio
lu_zero
patrick
dev-zero
ssuominen
scarabeus
gentoofan23
peper
_reopen_nominations
Can you please publish the full ranking output?
On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:02:45 Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
here's an item that should be relatively quick to address: fix the typo
in GLEP 39 where this line is missing (it's been in the council homepage
forever):
Only Gentoo developers may be nominated
I'd like
On Thursday 02 July 2009 10:54:05 Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to vote.
But what about the rest of the year? What happens when the person you
voted for sucks? You are mostly powerless to do anything other than be
I'll have things to say about this but I'm still in the woods with
dialup until monday. So either I can get close to a fatter pipe later
today or tomorrow, or I'll do it on monday night from home.
Denis.
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org wrote:
My only intention was to help offset
dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us.
Well that has been accomplished for now (w00t).
What is this all about? Did I miss something? Was Gentoo threatened with
On 24-06-2009 13:51:37 +, Torsten Veller wrote:
| mail-mta/exim.
I'm looking for users that want to help maintaining Exim. Especially if
you feel like becoming a Gentoo developer at some time, contact me
directly.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:47:45 Michael Higgins wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700 Ned Ludd wrote:
My only intention was to help offset
dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us.
Well that has been accomplished for now (w00t).
What is this all about? Did I miss
Hi,
in general you speak about the council but do you have any concrete
plans/goals you want to achieve?
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org:
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
Nor did I, especially because you were quite low on my ballot.
Congratulations.
The devs
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:14:25 +0200
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Another one of the things I'd like to see and help reform with the
council. First off it spends way too much time on EAPI/PMS. There is
no reason to make the council an extension of the portage team.
As member
Hi,
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:14:25 +0200
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Another one of the things I'd like to see and help reform with the
council. First off it spends way too much time on EAPI/PMS. There
is no reason to make
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:29:39 +0200
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Which groups who would like to be able to contribute currently feel
that they can't, why do they feel that and why haven't they said so?
For example people from the other package managers apart from
Paludis.
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 24-06-2009 13:51:37 +, Torsten Veller wrote:
| mail-mta/exim.
I'm looking for users that want to help maintaining Exim. Especially if
you feel like becoming a Gentoo developer at some time, contact me
directly.
I recommend you post this to planet, the forums,
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 22:14 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
in general you speak about the council but do you have any concrete
plans/goals you want to achieve?
I think we are in the information gathering phase right now on how to
best proceed. So nothing concrete as of this point.
commited, thank you all for the suggestions and the translations. I'll have to
ask again though, is it possible to have it in the main site as well? in fact,
who is in charge for the main site? gdp maybe?
On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:50:29 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Thursday 02 July 2009
Hi,
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) tampak...@gentoo.org:
+[0] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde4-guide.xml
\ No newline at end of file
You should configure your editor correctly.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/,
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
What I'd like to see for sure is a formal rule on who can decide to
modify or change parts of glep 39. As it's the council's constitution
somehow, we have two options from my pov (besides that a former council
did decide the council itself can change
Tobias Scherbaum dertobi...@gentoo.org posted
1246546445.6186.33.ca...@homer.ob.libexec.de, excerpted below, on Thu, 02
Jul 2009 16:54:05 +0200:
Ned Ludd wrote:
I'd like to see the dev body have a year-round voice in the council.
Either via quick votes year-round on topics or simply by having
Hi,
I'm assuming this is be the right place to discuss layman. If not,
please redirect me and ignore the rest.
I'm using layman-1.1.1 (not the most-recent). Its -o option appends
additional overlays to the list found in layman.cfg. If an overlay
appears in both lists, the one from cfg takes
Hi,
seems prefix-portage as of r13734, when used with '--nodeps', does merge
packages in reverse order than given on cmdline, but I don't believe
this is a prefix issue...
prefix-portage r13683 does merge in correct order.
/haubi/
--
Michael Haubenwallner
Gentoo on a different level
On 02-07-2009 15:31:16 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hi,
seems prefix-portage as of r13734, when used with '--nodeps', does merge
packages in reverse order than given on cmdline, but I don't believe
this is a prefix issue...
prefix-portage r13683 does merge in correct order.
13734
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hi,
seems prefix-portage as of r13734, when used with '--nodeps', does merge
packages in reverse order than given on cmdline, but I don't believe
this is a prefix issue...
prefix-portage r13683 does merge in correct order.
/haubi/
Thanks, fixed in r13757.
32 matches
Mail list logo
