On Monday 15 June 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> If there are interactive ebuilds that don't declare
> PROPERTIES="interactive", you can just compile a list and post it to
> gentoo-dev-announce telling maintainers to add it or you will do it at
> some date X a week from the announcement or later at yo
This week has gone pretty well and I'm hoping to get a testing server
up soon, though it looks like it will be running the backend in a
virtual machine due to the root privileges requirement. I've added
support for several more output formats: ext2 image, jffs2, and two
different styles of bootabl
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:08:48 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> Actually pkgcore folk have pushed for stuff. mtime preservation is a
> simple example of things I've pushed for- at the time implemented by
> portage/pkgcore, eliminates the orphan potential for .pyc and other
> generated files (iow, ver
Hi Torsten.
Torsten Veller wrote:
> * "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" :
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/2009/council-200906-nominees.xml
>
> Please archive the manifestos somewhere under the project space
> like it was done the last years.
> Looking back at the 2005 list of nomine
Luca Barbato wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I have a few ideas about this that I'll have to put in writing and share
later, but let me start by proposing that for such a change we require
the support of at least 2/3 of the devs that vote *and* a minimum of 1/3
of all devs.
I'd use ab
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:35 +0300
>> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> Display-If-In
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:43:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:29:39 +0200
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > > Which groups who would like to be able to contribute currently feel
> > > that they can't, why do they feel that and why haven't they said so?
> >
> > For exam
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> I have a few ideas about this that I'll have to put in writing and share
> later, but let me start by proposing that for such a change we require
> the support of at least 2/3 of the devs that vote *and* a minimum of 1/3
> of all devs.
I'd use absolute majority
On 02-07-2009 22:06:33 +0100, AllenJB wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 24-06-2009 13:51:37 +, Torsten Veller wrote:
> >> | mail-mta/exim.
> >
> > I'm looking for users that want to help maintaining Exim. Especially if
> > you feel like becoming a Gentoo developer at some time, contact me
