[gentoo-dev] stacking profile.bashrc?

2009-07-15 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
(seems the first mail was dropped somewhere, sorry when doubled) Hi, I'm facing this problem in Prefix on AIX, although it is a generic problem IMO: We do have post_src_install() hook in profiles/prefix/profile.bashrc to drop charset.alias for packages != libiconv, required for non-glibc

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-15 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Angelo Arrifano wrote: Hello all, I have the following packages that need a home in the portage tree: gpe-go gpe-julia gpe-life gpe-lights gpe-othello gpe-tetris gsoko xdemineur They are only a few and they won't increase much in the

[gentoo-dev] 2.6.30 stable plans

2009-07-15 Thread Mike Pagano
I'm planning to request the stabling of gentoo-sources-2.6.30 on July 22nd, 1 week from now. We have no known regressions in the kernel. Regressions in external packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug #277944. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these. Thanks, Mike Pagano

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool

2009-07-15 Thread Sérgio Almeida
Hello, On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 11:20 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: Sorry, I've lost track on what's really going on here: Does 'symlink' mean symlinks on the filesystem like 'ln -s' does? Or, more important, does uselect create those symlinks itself? If yes, please don't forget that OS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool

2009-07-15 Thread Sérgio Almeida
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:07 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: Usually the files are just copied instead of symlinked there. But as far as I know, there is no Unix-ish OS without symlink support - even Interix does support them. Although I cannot definitively say we won't have to select

[gentoo-dev] Re: Manifesto archive

2009-07-15 Thread Torsten Veller
* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org: Please archive the manifestos somewhere under the project space like it was done the last years. Yes, that is another thing I was planning to do. The only reason I haven't done it yet, is that older manifestos were stored as txt files

Re: [gentoo-dev] stacking profile.bashrc?

2009-07-15 Thread Zac Medico
Michael Haubenwallner wrote: Hi, I'm facing this problem in Prefix on AIX, although it is a generic problem IMO: We do have post_src_install() hook in profiles/prefix/profile.bashrc to drop charset.alias for packages != libiconv, required for non-glibc platforms. In

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-15 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Sebastian Pipping wrote: Robert Buchholz wrote: 1. has no DTD/xml validation schema I'd like to be part of the schema creation process [..] First try on a DTD and Relax NG schema for Layman's current overlays.xml format (used in layman-global.txt) over here:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass.

2009-07-15 Thread harley
On Tue, July 14, 2009 4:37 am, Christian Faulhammer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, René 'Necoro' Neumann li...@necoro.eu: Harley Peters schrieb: I'm getting good numbers from the command line but in the ebuild it's much different. I haven't timed it but it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for X11 on alphas

2009-07-15 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Tobias Klausmann wrote: Hi! On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org: Revision: 2 This is only needed for an in-repo revision...so please leave it at 1. but but no fixes are available yet, please see But but Imagine a trembling lower

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please stop requesting keywords for arches you don't have

2009-07-15 Thread Steven J Long
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Raúl Porcelarmi...@gentoo.org wrote: Also, *STOP* dropping keywords when a new dependency isn't keyworded without filing a bug for that architecture. Towards reducing arch load, I say that new packages should not be added to ~arch

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] install_qa_check() for hppa64 and ia64-hpux

2009-07-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 04:40:14 Michael Haubenwallner wrote: have noticed that the Evaluating misc gcc warnings QA check does not know about hppa64 cpu in bin/misc-functions.sh: alpha*|hppa64*|ia64*|powerpc64*|mips64*|sparc64*|sparcv9*|x86_64*) gentoo_bug=yes ;; esac looks fine to me -- feel