Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles
Zac Medico wrote: >> With the introduction of autobuilds, would it be a good idea to rename >> the profiles so that they don't have the date association? This does >> seem to confuse a number of new users who will appear asking where the >> 2009 profiles are. > > Maybe, but you could also look at this as a documentation/training > issue. My vote is for getting rid of the date association, too. The "where is 2009" aspect also is a strong point to me. Does sticking to dates have any real benefits? Sebastian
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22
Sebastian Pipping wrote: > What's next > === > Besides before-mentioned table the task > > Collect FEATURES variables in three sets (conf, defaults, globals), > not merged > http://soc.gentooexperimental.org/issues/show/58 > > is next on my list. Done. Previous test participants are welcome to re-submit as the data model change has basically reset the data collected on the FEATURES variable. Sebastian
[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for app-emulation/parallels-workstation
# Diego E. Pettenò (27 Aug 2009) # on behalf of QA team # # Fails to patch, bug #214719, since March 2008. # # Package need a new maintainer, possibly someone actually # using this stuff. # # Removal on 2009-10-26 app-emulation/parallels-workstation
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/cc-mode
Hi, # Ulrich Mueller (25 Aug 2009) # Included with GNU Emacs (since version 21 at least). # Last stand-alone release in 2006; cannot be compiled with Emacs 23. # Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 282662. app-emacs/cc-mode V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> signature.asc Description: PGP signature
