On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > 10.0 is retarded
> >>
> >> How would you like the problem to be addressed?
> >
> > we alrea
wxlib.eclass was added years ago to consolidate code shared between all the
different wx* implementations in the tree. As the number of different wx*
implementations in the tree equals 1, and nothing has used this eclass in two
and a half years, it will be put down. While I think it's batshit ins
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > 10.0 is retarded
>>
>> How would you like the problem to be addressed?
>
> we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step.
> -mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> 10.0 is retarded
>> How would you like the problem to be addressed?
>
> we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the
> ne
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > 10.0 is retarded
>
> How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> 10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
Sebastian
Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> seems smoltSendProfile doesnt work with unicode locales =)
> 100%] x11-wm/twm-1.0.4
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/smolt/client/sendProfile.py",
> line 211, in
> """ % excerpts
> UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii'
On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:39:17 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > I am seeking a positive code review on the following change to
> > flag-o-matic.eclass, diff is below (reasons are below that):
>
> Er, cancel that. The proposed patch isn't robust en
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 14:14:05 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 10:33 Mon 08 Dec , Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am seeking a positive code review on the following change to
> > flag-o-matic.eclass, diff is below (reasons are below that):
> >
> > %% cvs diff
> > Index: flag-o-matic.ecla
On Friday 28 August 2009 04:09:01 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Michael Hammer wrote:
> > Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
> >> Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
> >
> > YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
> > nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${mon
Josh Saddler wrote:
>> So what do we do?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
Please give more precise content pointers or summarize what you want to
point out.
Sebastian
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
>> in place already? :-p
>
> So what do we do?
>
>
>
> Sebastian
>
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
On Friday 31 July 2009 13:34:57 Petteri Räty wrote:
> I run:
> find /usr/portage/profiles/ -name "make.defaults" -exec grep ssl {} +
>
> It seems quite a few profiles enable ssl. To me it seems makes sense to
> enable it by default in base instead. If any profiles want it off by
> default they can
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
> in place already? :-p
So what do we do?
Sebastian
Le dimanche 23 août 2009 à 10:24 +, Duncan a écrit :
> But at three months, I'd be beginning to consider a reinstall from
> stages, tho I'd probably still do the in-place upgrade. But beyond
> that,
> people are really only making it harder on themselves, and by six
> months,
It really dep
28 Aug 2009; Samuli Suominen package.mask:
+ Mask media-libs/rte for removal as it's orphaned library and ships a
+ modified copy of FFmpeg.
# Samuli Suominen (28 Aug 2009)
# Orphaned libraries. Both install only a static archive
# and a include file. No reverse deps. QA issues.
# Masked for removal.
media-libs/loadpng
media-libs/mpeg-lib
If you have a good reason why we need these pkgs that install only one
.a and one .h with no revd
Michael Hammer wrote:
> Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
>> Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
>
> YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
> nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a
> while discussing if it isn't better to switch back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
> Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a
while discussing if it isn't better
19 matches
Mail list logo
