-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a
while discussing if it isn't better
Michael Hammer wrote:
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a
while discussing if it isn't better to switch back to an
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (28 Aug 2009)
# Orphaned libraries. Both install only a static archive
# and a include file. No reverse deps. QA issues.
# Masked for removal.
media-libs/loadpng
media-libs/mpeg-lib
If you have a good reason why we need these pkgs that install only one
.a
28 Aug 2009; Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org package.mask:
+ Mask media-libs/rte for removal as it's orphaned library and ships a
+ modified copy of FFmpeg.
Le dimanche 23 août 2009 à 10:24 +, Duncan a écrit :
But at three months, I'd be beginning to consider a reinstall from
stages, tho I'd probably still do the in-place upgrade. But beyond
that,
people are really only making it harder on themselves, and by six
months,
It really depends
Samuli Suominen wrote:
You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
in place already? :-p
So what do we do?
Sebastian
On Friday 31 July 2009 13:34:57 Petteri Räty wrote:
I run:
find /usr/portage/profiles/ -name make.defaults -exec grep ssl {} +
It seems quite a few profiles enable ssl. To me it seems makes sense to
enable it by default in base instead. If any profiles want it off by
default they can start
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
in place already? :-p
So what do we do?
Sebastian
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Josh Saddler wrote:
So what do we do?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
Please give more precise content pointers or summarize what you want to
point out.
Sebastian
On Friday 28 August 2009 04:09:01 Samuli Suominen wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 14:14:05 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 10:33 Mon 08 Dec , Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Hello,
I am seeking a positive code review on the following change to
flag-o-matic.eclass, diff is below (reasons are below that):
%% cvs diff
Index: flag-o-matic.eclass
RCS
On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:39:17 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am seeking a positive code review on the following change to
flag-o-matic.eclass, diff is below (reasons are below that):
Er, cancel that. The proposed patch
Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Hi all!
seems smoltSendProfile doesnt work with unicode locales =)
100%] x11-wm/twm-1.0.4
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/smolt/client/sendProfile.py,
line 211, in module
% excerpts
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
Sebastian
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the
next step.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step.
wxlib.eclass was added years ago to consolidate code shared between all the
different wx* implementations in the tree. As the number of different wx*
implementations in the tree equals 1, and nothing has used this eclass in two
and a half years, it will be put down. While I think it's batshit
18 matches
Mail list logo
