[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for net-misc/rarpd

# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Aug 2009) # on behalf of QA team # # Blocks iputils since 2007 (and iputils is a system # package); lacks a Gentoo maintainer, and upstream seems # to be gone. The same code has been used and patched since # 2002 at least. # # Removal on 2009-10-29 net-misc/rarpd

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-util/qtunit

# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Aug 2009) # on behalf of QA team # # Uses serial make (and can't build in parallel, bug # #283170); last release in 2004, declared dead upstream, # uses Qt 3. # # Removal on 2009-10-29 dev-util/qtunit

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for sys-process/acctail

# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Aug 2009) # on behalf of QA team # # Fails to build since at least November 2007, bug #199164. # # Removal on 2009-10-29 sys-process/acctail

[gentoo-dev] Re: 2009.0 profiles

Mike Frysinger posted on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:56:33 -0400 as excerpted: > On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> > 10.0 is retar

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

> On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Alex Alexander wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> we already have a simple logical version system.  2009.0 is the >> next step. > Years do not make a good versioning scheme, if one release gets out > late you're automatically considered ou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for flag-o-matic.eclass (append-ldflags)

On 28-08-2009 16:08:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > As such, we will leave > > it local to Gentoo Prefix until we can come up with a better idea. > > stick it behind userland_GNU ? i dont mind extending append-ldflags > in such a way, but the "pro" you listed originally (protect users from >