Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant?

2009-11-10 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 09/11/2009 17:30, Patrick Lauer a écrit : Ok, here's the real problem; Unmaintained stuff is unmaintained Patrick, Just piping in to say that dropping a package from portage isn't the end of the world, we have a very good process for it and it has proven to be very effective. Dead

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22

2009-11-10 Thread Torsten Veller
* Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org: What's next === What's the status of the stats project? What's missing? What help is needed? I'd really like to see a system that can answer: How often is cpv x installed on arch y (testing/stable flavour)?

[gentoo-dev] Removing kde-base/arts from tree.

2009-11-10 Thread Samuli Suominen
Here's _somewhat_ complete list of ebuilds that have a depend on kde-base/arts, excluding those that are masked for other reasons or ones that I plan on handling myself. app-backup/konserve-0.10.3:arts app-dicts/kannadic-1.7.0:arts app-dicts/kannadic-2.0.3:arts app-i18n/skim-scim-anthy-1.2.4:arts

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing kde-base/arts from tree.

2009-11-10 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm tempted to say otherwise it will be hardmasked with kde-base/arts by the end of this week, but that might be too intimidating for some. And completely unreasonable. Some of us have a life. Denis, wondering why the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing kde-base/arts from tree.

2009-11-10 Thread Samuli Suominen
Denis Dupeyron wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm tempted to say otherwise it will be hardmasked with kde-base/arts by the end of this week, but that might be too intimidating for some. And completely unreasonable. Some of us have a life.