On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a
> thread at gentoo-dev ML:
>
> agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item:
>
> Adding real multilib features from current multilib-portage to currently
On 2009.12.16 00:36, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As announced by Denis (Calchan)[1], we need to have an election for
> the
> Gentoo Council's empty seat.
> We'll be putting up a page with all the information for the Council
> election, including the election officials, asap. I'l
On 12/24/09 05:53, Ronan Arraes Jardim Chagas wrote:
> Nevertheless, the current portage ebuild
> installs a wrong libpgf.pc, because it states that the include
> directory is /usr/include but it really is /usr/include/libpgf (can
> anyone fix it or should I open a bug?).
I would say open a bug as
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:37:26 -0500
Richard Freeman wrote:
> I think we should definitely have some way of designating which
> should be the contact for bugs. I've had some bugs sit around for a
> while without being noticed because they were assigned to the herd
> the package is in, and not to m
On 12/23/2009 01:36 PM, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Perhaps we should create a schema to validate the file. XMLSchema (or
any of the other standards) allows for much more flexibility in
specifying these things. Btw. I did not design the metadata DTD for
order to be significant. The only priority is th
