The bug you mentioned [253725] is not about layman location, it's only
about keepdir line. Why don't we fix that and don't change defaults
another time? Such change does more harm for our users then good.
В Сбт, 16/01/2010 в 02:55 +0100, Sebastian Pipping пишет:
On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger
It's just impossible to choose perfect location that suits all needs and
it should stay user-configurable. So again, do not change this default
we no real need another time, please.
/usr/local is a bad choice for an ebuild-generated default. Like I said in bug
#253725 I don't want ebuilds to
On 15-01-2010 20:36:20 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
I would like to get it right with the next switch.
Would
/var/lib/layman
do well? /var/cache/layman seems inadequate as it might not be
regenerated [2] without losses (as upstream moves along).
Would be great to hear a few
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Lars Wendler polynomia...@gentoo.org wrote:
It's just impossible to choose perfect location that suits all needs and
it should stay user-configurable. So again, do not change this default
we no real need another time, please.
/usr/local is a bad choice for an
2010/1/16 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org:
On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if you want to keep all of layman's stuff together, then about your only
option is to create your own tree at like /var/layman/.
anybody objecting to /var/layman ?
I like that.
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo
2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org:
layman cache is nfs distributable. Also it's good idea to have it close
to PORTDIR. Thus I'd like to keep it somewhere at /usr.
I'd like both to be under /var/
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
On 01/12/2010 12:23 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Raaal Porcel wrote:
scarabeus told me that the eclass can't be removed until two years since
the deprecation date, so...
Removal of the eclass on 2012/01/11
Reasoning? Prior to env saving we couldn't
On 01/16/10 05:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:55:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the better idea
though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines.
cache files = /var/cache/layman/
as i said: it's not a normal cache.
On 01/16/10 12:17, Fabian Groffen wrote:
How about storing it in DISTDIR (like metadata.xml)? Or storing it
somewhere in the rsync image?
I'm not really sure what you have in mind.
Can you make it a bit more visual for me?
Sebastian
On 01/16/10 13:56, Ben de Groot wrote:
anybody objecting to /var/layman ?
I like that.
it seems that
/var/layman
is the only location nobody has objected to, yet. i plan to go with
that atm. /var/lib/layman is my second favorite.
again, any objections?
sebastian
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
it seems that
/var/layman
is the only location nobody has objected to, yet. i plan to go with
that atm. /var/lib/layman is my second favorite.
again, any objections?
Why not make it a configuration option,
dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org:
layman cache is nfs distributable. Also it's good idea to have it close
to PORTDIR. Thus I'd like to keep it somewhere at /usr.
I'd like both to be under /var/
On 01/16/10 19:31, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Why not make it a configuration option, with the default as
/var/layman (or whatever you want)?
It is configurable already (see /etc/layman/layman.cfg)
#---
# Defines the directory where
lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:16 +0100 skrev Sebastian Pipping:
On 01/16/10 05:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:55:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the better idea
though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines.
cache
lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Jörg Schaible:
dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org:
layman cache is nfs distributable. Also it's good idea to have it close
to PORTDIR. Thus I'd like to
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:57:39 +0100
Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote:
lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Jörg Schaible:
dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org:
layman cache is
Mike Frysinger dixit (2010-01-15, 20:45):
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
- From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If
/var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-01-16, 00:41):
2010/1/15 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
-1, /usr/local/layman?
/usr/local/ is a location the system should avoid. Somewhere in /var/
seems to be
On 01/16/10 23:46, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers).
Why is that? Please tell more.
Sebastian
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org wrote:
Yes, PORTDIR default location under /usr was a totally stupid thing.
Please don't repeat it...
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual
On Saturday 16 January 2010 17:46:08 Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org wrote:
Yes, PORTDIR default location under /usr was a totally stupid thing.
Please don't repeat it...
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be
21 matches
Mail list logo
