Re: [gentoo-dev] The feature patch mess in the webalizer ebuild (and how to deal with it)

2010-03-10 Thread Alistair Bush
Solution 1) Add two new packages to the tree: - app-admin/geolizer (/usr/bin/geolizer) - app-admin/webalizer-xtended (/usr/bin/webalizer-xtended) 2) Bump webalizer to 2.21 while - no longer applying either feature patch - removing use flag xtended - keeping now

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote: We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their maintainers in Gentoo. Bugday is occupying the first

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an underground thing, so it's time to raise its awareness. like other aspects of Gentoo, all Gentoo developers have access to it to add their

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Alex Alexander
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:45:21AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an underground thing, so it's time to raise its awareness. like other

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org: All problems, which were blocking stabilization of Python 3, have been fixed. Stabilization of Python 3.1.2 is currently scheduled on 2010-04-19. I'm attaching the news item for Python 3.1. Will add my comments for the whole

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 07:56:42 Alex Alexander wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:45:21AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an underground

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Alex Alexander
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:18:11AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 10 March 2010 07:56:42 Alex Alexander wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:45:21AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). this has been

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Dror Levin
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 14:45, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an underground thing, so it's time to raise its awareness. like other

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 10 March 2010 06:17, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: On 03/10/10 06:00, Joshua Saddler wrote: Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays. [...] Also, another day means one more day a month with

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages

2010-03-10 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
As last step i fixed issue with circular dependencies. So please speak-up now because if no complains are sent, i will add this eclass in 5 hours into main tree. For the eclass see attachment. Tomas # Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Mark Loeser
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org said: On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote: We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their maintainers in

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 16:41:59 Mark Loeser wrote: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org said: On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote: We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few

Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer

2010-03-10 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Wednesday 10 of March 2010 07:52:28 Benedikt Böhm wrote: Hi! On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18) is not even in Gentoo but on SourceForge only. The release on sourceforge

Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer

2010-03-10 Thread Benedikt Böhm
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 10 of March 2010 07:52:28 Benedikt Böhm wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18) is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer

2010-03-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:09:26 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote: This issue always bothered me. Why do we need exclusive web-app config application that effectively mirrors what emerge is supposed to do? I mean installation/removal/updates, and what's the most important config

Re: [gentoo-dev] The feature patch mess in the webalizer ebuild (and how to deal with it)

2010-03-10 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Done. Three packages now, webalizer bumped. - app-admin/geolizer - app-admin/webalizer - app-admin/webalizer-xtended I'm 100% sure i broke something, please let me know what it is once you found out ;-) Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 09 mars 2010 à 22:32 -0600, Nathan Zachary a écrit : On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello! We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-10 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-08 22:28:16 William Hubbs napisał(a): On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:19:36PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: No, it won't. To prove it, I've just tested with a stable stage3 containing portage-2.1.7.x. Here are the steps: 1) extract stable stage3 and chroot into it 2) mkdir /etc/portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/10/10 15:41, Mark Loeser wrote: I don't even think the maintainer-needed ones should be bumped. Who knows what bugs you are introducing into the tree. This is why things eventually get treecleaned. I purposely wrote no big deal _to their maintainers_ - I wonder why everyone is so scare

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org said: On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote: We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/10/10 14:59, Ben de Groot wrote: I think it would be better to have it all happen on the same day. If those are easy bumps, they fit very well with bugday. And those devs who want to work on that, can then join the general bugday mayhem. ;-) You might be spreading things too thinly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2010.03.10 12:45, Mike Frysinger wrote: the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). [snip] the access step requires a bit of help though -- simply e-mail me off list your gmail account and we can get you set up. once you have access, you may

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages

2010-03-10 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 15:13:40 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: As last step i fixed issue with circular dependencies. So please speak-up now because if no complains are sent, i will add this eclass in 5 hours into main tree. For the eclass see attachment. Tomas 5 hours? :o -- Cheers Dawid

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages

2010-03-10 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne 03/10/2010 08:40 PM, Dawid Węgliński napsal(a): On Wednesday 10 March 2010 15:13:40 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: As last step i fixed issue with circular dependencies. So please speak-up now because if no complains are sent, i will add this eclass in 5 hours into main tree. For the eclass see

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:45:21 -0500 as excerpted: the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an underground thing, so it's time to raise its awareness. like other

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 10 March 2010 19:50, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: On 03/10/10 14:59, Ben de Groot wrote: I think it would be better to have it all happen on the same day. The thing is bugday will soon not be thin anymore: it will require all the attention of all online devs: there weill be no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 10 March 2010 18:36, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: Almost everybody has at least 1 package installed which supports both Python 2 and Python 3 and depends on dev-lang/python without version specification, so Python 3 would be pulled into dependency graph,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Mark Loeser
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net said: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with search and the web crawling and database correlation Google does, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Richard Freeman
On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with search and the web crawling and database correlation Google does, and whatever

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Duncan
Richard Freeman posted on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:04:54 -0500 as excerpted: On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 16:42:43 Duncan wrote: Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:45:21 -0500 as excerpted: the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an underground

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mercredi 10 mars 2010 à 18:04 -0500, Richard Freeman a écrit : On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with search

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? Write access. What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with search and the web crawling and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 à 05:28 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit : On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? Write access. What about those who might think

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 19:02:19 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 à 05:28 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit : On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:43:04PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 10 March 2010 18:36, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: Almost everybody has at least 1 package installed which supports both Python 2 and Python 3 and depends on dev-lang/python without version

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:42:43PM +, Duncan wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? A Google account != Gmail account. I use Google calendars extensively myself, but it's NOT linked to a Gmail account. So the above

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 11 March 2010 01:25, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:  If someone has a package that truly works with either python 2 or 3,  what is the harm in automatically pulling in python 3 and installing  the package for both python 2 and 3?  As long as pulling in python-3 doesn't change the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 8 March 2010 02:17, Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs patches. Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do. Thanks Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:24:46AM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 11 March 2010 01:25, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: ??If someone has a package that truly works with either python 2 or 3, ??what is the harm in automatically pulling in python 3 and installing ??the package for both

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-10 Thread Jacob Godserv
The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or two references to what has been predetermined as policy for stabilization. I think we should do a little less debating over personal opinions (which is a hot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events

2010-03-10 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:42:43 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least if they want calendar access? What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with search and the web crawling and

[gentoo-dev] Re: How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:41:59 -0500 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote: As Mike said, for ones with maintainers, don't touch them unless you have explicit permission. We have maintainers for a reason, and if you don't know the intricacies of the package, you shouldn't be touching it. You

[gentoo-portage-dev] a feature called stabilize wanted

2010-03-10 Thread Johannes Kellner
Hello List ans anyone! I'm searching for a feature or an hint how and where to implement it. The desired feature could be called stabilize or update to stable and would change the selected packages when doing an update (emerge -avuND world). Just to give you an initial idea/example, some

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] a feature called stabilize wanted

2010-03-10 Thread Alistair Bush
Hello List ans anyone! I'm searching for a feature or an hint how and where to implement it. Mmmm... Im not one of the knowledgable ppl around here but you can have version ranges within files like package.keywords eg cat/A-4.0 which would mean ~arch A-4.0 = arch which is