[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-03-14 23h59 UTC
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-03-14 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-perl/Email-MIME-Creator 2010-03-14 12:27:13 tove dev-perl/Email-MIME-Modifier2010-03-14 12:27:19 tove dev-perl/Email-Simple-Creator 2010-03-14 12:27:21 tove dev-perl/XML-LibXML-Common 2010-03-14 12:27:23 tove dev-util/darcs 2010-03-14 12:50:23 kolmodin Additions: dev-vcs/bzr-gtk 2010-03-08 08:47:08 fauli dev-vcs/bzr-explorer2010-03-08 08:51:17 fauli dev-haskell/json2010-03-08 23:40:08 kolmodin dev-haskell/curl2010-03-08 23:42:26 kolmodin dev-vcs/bzr-rewrite 2010-03-09 09:59:35 fauli app-admin/supervisor2010-03-09 13:45:31 djc net-im/qutecom 2010-03-09 16:35:15 chithanh app-admin/geolizer 2010-03-10 16:13:36 sping app-admin/webalizer-xtended 2010-03-10 16:42:44 sping games-util/deutex 2010-03-10 17:58:25 mr_bones_ net-analyzer/iptraf-ng 2010-03-10 18:59:11 jer dev-cpp/gstreamermm 2010-03-10 20:40:16 flameeyes net-misc/slimrat2010-03-10 21:33:28 scarabeus profiles/releases/freebsd-8.0 2010-03-11 10:26:43 aballier sys-auth/pam-pgsql 2010-03-11 13:53:10 flameeyes app-emulation/ganeti-htools 2010-03-11 17:14:00 ramereth dev-dotnet/google-gdata-sharp 2010-03-11 18:44:20 ford_prefect app-vim/vim-spell-he2010-03-11 23:24:30 spatz app-vim/vim-spell-it2010-03-11 23:42:41 spatz app-vim/vim-spell-hu2010-03-12 00:02:46 spatz app-vim/vim-spell-pt2010-03-12 00:12:05 spatz mail-filter/isbg2010-03-12 09:46:45 wired dev-db/desktopcouch 2010-03-13 18:33:38 neurogeek media-gfx/viewnior 2010-03-13 20:24:36 hwoarang dev-util/dissy 2010-03-13 20:37:40 hwoarang dev-libs/libmail2010-03-13 20:45:24 hwoarang dev-libs/json-c 2010-03-14 11:55:10 hwoarang dev-vcs/darcs 2010-03-14 12:29:26 kolmodin x11-themes/shiki-colors 2010-03-14 13:46:29 pacho dev-haskell/ansi-terminal 2010-03-14 18:01:00 kolmodin dev-haskell/ansi-wl-pprint 2010-03-14 18:12:04 kolmodin app-accessibility/festival-ru 2010-03-14 21:02:40 neurogeek -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 Removed Packages: dev-perl/Email-MIME-Creator,removed,tove,2010-03-14 12:27:13 dev-perl/Email-MIME-Modifier,removed,tove,2010-03-14 12:27:19 dev-perl/Email-Simple-Creator,removed,tove,2010-03-14 12:27:21 dev-perl/XML-LibXML-Common,removed,tove,2010-03-14 12:27:23 dev-util/darcs,removed,kolmodin,2010-03-14 12:50:23 Added Packages: dev-vcs/bzr-gtk,added,fauli,2010-03-08 08:47:08 dev-vcs/bzr-explorer,added,fauli,2010-03-08 08:51:17 dev-haskell/json,added,kolmodin,2010-03-08 23:40:08 dev-haskell/curl,added,kolmodin,2010-03-08 23:42:26 dev-vcs/bzr-rewrite,added,fauli,2010-03-09 09:59:35 app-admin/supervisor,added,djc,2010-03-09 13:45:31 net-im/qutecom,added,chithanh,2010-03-09 16:35:15 app-admin/geolizer,added,sping,2010-03-10 16:13:36 app-admin/webalizer-xtended,added,sping,2010-03-10 16:42:44 games-util/deutex,added,mr_bones_,2010-03-10 17:58:25 net-analyzer/iptraf-ng,added,jer,2010-03-10 18:59:11 dev-cpp/gstreamermm,added,flameeyes,2010-03-10 20:40:16 net-misc/slimrat,added,scarabeus,2010-03-10 21:33:28 profiles/releases/freebsd-8.0,added,aballier,2010-03-11 10:26:43 sys-auth/pam-pgsql,added,flameeyes,2010-03-11 13:53:10 app-emulation/ganeti-htools,added,ramereth,2010-03-11 17:14:00 dev-dotnet/google-gdata-sharp,added,ford_prefect,2010-03-11 18:44:20 app-vim/vim-spell-he,added,spatz,2010-03-11 23:24:30 app-vim/vim-spell-it,added,spatz,2010-03-11 23:42:41 app-vim/vim-spell-hu,added,spatz,2010-03-12 00:02:46 app-vim/vim-spell-pt,added,spatz,2010-03-12 00:12:05 mail-filter/isbg,added,wired,2010-03-12 09:46:45 dev-db/desktopcouch,added,neurogeek,2010-03-13 18:33:38 media-gfx/viewnior,added,hwoarang,2010-03-13 20:24:36 dev-util/dissy,added,hwoarang,2010-03-13 20:37:40 dev-libs/libmail,added,hwoarang,2010-03-13 20:45:24 dev-libs/json-c,added,hwoarang,2010-03-14 11:55:10 dev-vcs/darcs,added,kolmodin,2010-03-14 12:29:26 x11-themes/shiki-colors,added,pacho,2010-03-14 13:46:29 dev-haskell/ansi-terminal,added,kolmodin,2010-03-14 18:01:00 dev-haskell/ansi-wl-pprint,added,kolmodin,2010-03-14 18:12:04 app-accessibility/festival-ru,added,neurogeek,2010-03-14 21:02:40 Done.
[gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:21:13 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote: > You misunderstood what I meant. The action I am talking about is > reopening the bug. Any developer who notices that a bug should be > reopened should reopen it so it gets noticed. Sorry, my mistake. -- fonts,by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
On 03/12/2010 08:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in > question but there's a difference of opinion here: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5 > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch > team is the one in charge. > > Regards, > Petteri > I prefer the maintainer being the assignee. What about cases, where someone else does open that stable request bug? If the policy is to always assign it to the maintainer, he can still decide, if or when the packages is ready, else some stabilisation might be done, also the maintainer had still outstanding issues. -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages
On 14 March 2010 06:09, James Cloos wrote: >> "BdG" == Ben de Groot writes: > > BdG> Abandoned packages do not belong in the portage tree. > > Nonsense. That attitude only servers to harm the user base. You're wrong. It serves to protect our users from potentially broken and vulnerable packages. It ascertains a Quality Assurance level that we and our users can be comfortable with. > Leaving them in does not. It does, as it opens the users up to unknown security vulnerabilities and increasing brokenness as bugs are not addressed. If Gentoo would stop caring about QA, then we'd be wasting our time working on making this a better distro. Cheers, -- Ben de Groot Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) __
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
On 03/14/2010 10:56 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:07:41 +0200 > Petteri Räty wrote: > >> When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers >> use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't >> see why maintainers would be any more likely to act than an arch team >> comprised of multiple people in the case of bigger arches. > > Hasn't the running theme for the last couple weeks been about not touching > packages you don't maintain and aren't throughly familiar with? ;) > > Anyways, it's simply not the arch team's job to fix the issues that pop up > unless they somehow caused them. If there's a bug in the ebuild an arch > tester missed it's the maintainer who is responsible for fixing it. > You misunderstood what I meant. The action I am talking about is reopening the bug. Any developer who notices that a bug should be reopened should reopen it so it gets noticed. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:07:41 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote: > When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers > use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't > see why maintainers would be any more likely to act than an arch team > comprised of multiple people in the case of bigger arches. Hasn't the running theme for the last couple weeks been about not touching packages you don't maintain and aren't throughly familiar with? ;) Anyways, it's simply not the arch team's job to fix the issues that pop up unless they somehow caused them. If there's a bug in the ebuild an arch tester missed it's the maintainer who is responsible for fixing it. I think the maintainer should always be the assignee. If/when we move to bugzilla flags for arch testing this is going to have to be how it works anyways. -- fonts,by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
