On 6/11/10 5:27 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> - Ability to split woodpecker/dev.g.o up, and have an EU dev machine,
> and a US dev machine. (If mail isn't being forwarded outside of our
> systems, you would put in ${userna...@eu.dev.gentoo.org.
Sounds good to me. Looks like it would have lower
В Срд, 09/06/2010 в 21:21 +0200, Harald van Dijk пишет:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:38:03AM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
> > 1. Do we want all packages to support LINGUAS if possible? It is
> > possible to leave gettext based package without LINGUAS and everything
> > will just work, but I think that
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:45:14PM +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 10/06/2010 22:45, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis a écrit :
> > 2010-06-10 22:20:44 Nirbheek Chauhan napisał(a):
> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> >> wrote:
> >>> 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Je
El vie, 11-06-2010 a las 00:38 +0200, Christian Ruppert escribió:
> On 06/10/2010 07:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml ) when
> > becoming "devaway". Th
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Theo Chatzimichos
wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2010 06:27:26 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> Related to integration of that, I would like opinions on moving some
>> data from developer home directories into LDAP. I already placed the SPF
>> data straight into LDAP, since
On Friday 11 June 2010 06:27:26 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Related to integration of that, I would like opinions on moving some
> data from developer home directories into LDAP. I already placed the SPF
> data straight into LDAP, since I needed to be able to reach it from
> another machine anyway.
>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml ) when
> becoming "devaway".
Related to integration of that, I would like opinions on moving some
data
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
>> I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog entry here.
>
> ChangeLog entries are not required for trivial changes.
>
A "trivial" change is fixing a typo, or a manifest probl
Le 10/06/2010 22:45, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis a écrit :
> 2010-06-10 22:20:44 Nirbheek Chauhan napisał(a):
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
>> wrote:
>>> 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog ent
2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
> I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog entry here.
ChangeLog entries are not required for trivial changes.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
2010-06-10 22:16:23 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
> On 10-06-2010 22:00:19 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
> > > I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog entry here.
> >
> > ChangeLog entries are not required for trivial changes.
>
>
On 10-06-2010 22:00:19 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
> > I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog entry here.
>
> ChangeLog entries are not required for trivial changes.
Apart from whether or not this is true, do I understand well
2010-06-10 22:20:44 Nirbheek Chauhan napisał(a):
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
> >> I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog entry here.
> >
> > ChangeLog entries are not required for trivial changes
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2010-06-10 22:16:23 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
>> On 10-06-2010 22:00:19 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> > 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
>> > > I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog
On 06/10/2010 07:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml ) when
> becoming "devaway". The problem is that a lot of our users don't know
> about that devaway list and,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:19:33 + (UTC), "Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis (arfrever)" wrote:
> arfrever10/06/10 19:19:33
>
> Modified: traits-3.4.0.ebuild
> Log:
> Fix dependencies. Use -fno-strict-aliasing.
> (Portage version: HEAD/cvs/Linux x86_64)
>
> Revision Ch
El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 12:23 -0600, Joe Peterson escribió:
> I think a better solution, if we need to indicate this, is to have
> bugzilla grab the status from devaway and display it next to the dev's
> name in bug reports. Changing the user's name seems a bit cumbersome,
> and I don't agree tha
I think a better solution, if we need to indicate this, is to have
bugzilla grab the status from devaway and display it next to the dev's
name in bug reports. Changing the user's name seems a bit cumbersome,
and I don't agree that people will know what "devaway" means - i.e.
they may not even goog
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:36:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 07:28 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >> On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >>> What do you think about doing the following change in
>
Hello
Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml ) when
becoming "devaway". The problem is that a lot of our users don't know
about that devaway list and, then, they will still open bug reports and
complaint w
On 06/10/2010 07:28 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>> What do you think about doing the following change in
>>> /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
>>
>> The follow
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > What do you think about doing the following change in
> > /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
>
> The following change has now landed in CVS:
I'd suggest a
22 matches
Mail list logo
