[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse

2010-06-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:25:32 + Jeremy Olexa wrote: > What is the consensus on if the metadata.xml specifies that it will add > CFLAGS? Surely it is not as black/white as the global suggests..? > > local:debug:app-portage/eix: Build with CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS for debugging > support; not recommend

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse

2010-06-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 19:25:32 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:09:00 +0200, "Diego E. 'Flameeyes'" Pettenò wrote: > > Please check the linked documentation or my blog post[1] on the matter > > if you want to understand the reasoning. I'll be dropping the flag and > > its context

Re: [gentoo-dev] dotnet herd is "empty"

2010-06-30 Thread Christopher Swift
If possible I'd like to contribute to this herd, I have little ebuild experience but I am a willing learner with a keen interest in Mono/dotNET technologies. I am not (yet) a Gentoo developer nor have I lots of experience with ebuilds however I have taken an interest in writing them lately having

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse

2010-06-30 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 6/30/10 5:09 PM, Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > Please check the linked documentation or my blog post[1] on the > matter if you want to understand the reasoning. Could you rather add these guidelines to the QA project webpage? I wouldn't consider a blog post a documentation of a policy t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse

2010-06-30 Thread Petteri Räty
On 07/01/2010 02:25 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:09:00 +0200, "Diego E. 'Flameeyes'" Pettenò > wrote: > >> Please check the linked documentation or my blog post[1] on the matter >> if you want to understand the reasoning. I'll be dropping the flag and >> its context from now o

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse

2010-06-30 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:09:00 +0200, "Diego E. 'Flameeyes'" Pettenò wrote: > Please check the linked documentation or my blog post[1] on the matter > if you want to understand the reasoning. I'll be dropping the flag and > its context from now on if I stumble across it, without further > warnings.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in gnome-extra/tasks: tasks-0.16.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-06-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 29 juin 2010 à 15:39 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a écrit : > ssuominen10/06/29 15:39:28 > > Modified: tasks-0.16.ebuild ChangeLog > Log: > Fix building testsuite with -Wl,--as-needed wrt #294878 by Kacper Kowalik. > (Portage version: 2.2_rc67/cvs/Linux x86_6

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for media-video/em84xx-modules; media-video/em84xx-libraries; media-plugins/vdr-em84xx; media-video/packetcommand

2010-06-30 Thread Diego E . Pettenò
# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Jun 2010) # on behalf of QA team # # Modules fail to build with relatively-recent kernels (at # least since .30); librraies fial to build since at least # July 2009 in ~arch for built_with_use (and now in stable # as well). The other two are reverse dependencies. # # These

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council manifesto for jmbsvicetto

2010-06-30 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Theo. On 29-06-2010 11:49, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > wrote: >> Please feel free to ask any questions you'd like to be answered. > > 1) Is it possible an election official to run for t

[gentoo-dev] dotnet herd is "empty"

2010-06-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello I noticed some time ago that mono stuff is a bit unmaintained, looking at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml#doc_chap32 I confirmed that the only dotnet herd member is retiring ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149480 ) Would be nice if anybody could join to