On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
>
>> What you are saying makes sense for desktop users since they will
>> likely already have consolekit/policykit/nm-applet installed, and
>> hence using NetworkManager for all network management makes sense.
>
On Thursday 03 of June 2010 01:32:09 Nathan Phillip Brink wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 03:29:01PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 of May 2010 19:27:43 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 05:38:00 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > > > I've updated documentation, add
Hi folks,
I'm looking for a way for transforming ebuild's src_prepare
actions into git commits. I guess it would involve tweaking
epatch to do git-apply calls etc.
Did anyone else already work in this area ?
cu
--
-
Enrico
* Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
> On 07/06/10 22:04, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >> Enrico, There are actually so many 404s on your homepage (including
> >> both links in your email signature) that it quickly loses my attention
> >> span.
> >
> > Which ones ?
> > (I know, some old stuff is broken, I did
On 07/06/10 22:04, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> Enrico, There are actually so many 404s on your homepage (including
>> both links in your email signature) that it quickly loses my attention
>> span.
>
> Which ones ?
> (I know, some old stuff is broken, I didnt have the time to
> clean it all up yet ;
On 07/06/10 22:04, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Jeremy Olexa schrieb:
>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:48:43 +0200, Enrico Weigelt
>> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> please refer my recent postings on details what the oss-qm
>>> project is all about. just a few words: the main idea is to
>>>
>>
>> Enrico, Th
* Peter Volkov schrieb:
> Enrico I don't see why we may need to maintain separate ebuilds for
> programs with patches scheduled upstream.
This all is part of a bigger strategy, we've already discussed here.
See: http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-2010050101.pdf
> Submit important patc
* Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
> > While I may lacking understanding that the zlib maintainers in Gentoo do
> > have, your changes look self-explaining to me.
>
> ^ "do not" missing, sorry.
Which changes dont you understand ?
I'll be happy to answer all questions :)
cu
--
-
* Jeremy Olexa schrieb:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:48:43 +0200, Enrico Weigelt
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > please refer my recent postings on details what the oss-qm
> > project is all about. just a few words: the main idea is to
> >
>
> Enrico, There are actually so many 404s on your homepage
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:48:43 +0200, Enrico Weigelt
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> please refer my recent postings on details what the oss-qm
> project is all about. just a few words: the main idea is to
>
Enrico, There are actually so many 404s on your homepage (including
both links in your email signat
On 07/06/10 19:07, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Enrico,
>
>
> thanks for sharing your changes with us.
> I had a look at the diff as I was curious.
>
> While I may lacking understanding that the zlib maintainers in Gentoo do
> have, your changes look self-explaining to me.
^ "
Enrico,
thanks for sharing your changes with us.
I had a look at the diff as I was curious.
While I may lacking understanding that the zlib maintainers in Gentoo do
have, your changes look self-explaining to me.
Maybe you could comment on the diff and explain your changes.
Best,
Sebastian
В Втр, 06/07/2010 в 01:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt пишет:
> Hi folks,
> does he speak for all of you ?
Enrico I don't see why we may need to maintain separate ebuilds for
programs with patches scheduled upstream. Submit important patches
separately or, better, work with upstream so we'll get everythi
13 matches
Mail list logo
