[gentoo-dev] Re: Should I file three bug reports or just one?

2010-07-14 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Nikos Chantziaras : > This won't work correctly for these three packages: > >app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs >app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs >app-emulation/vmware-workstation > > because revdep-rebuild wants to emerge them repeatedly, since they're > binary packages.

[gentoo-dev] Should I file three bug reports or just one?

2010-07-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
I've updated to dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0a today, and it tells me: Old versions of installed libraries were detected on your system. In order to avoid breaking packages that depend on these old libs, the libraries are not being removed. You need to run revdep-rebuild in order to remove these old de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio

2010-07-14 Thread Steve Dibb
On 07/14/2010 05:27 PM, Paul Arthur wrote: On 2010-07-14, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: =20 All, =20 I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the cat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-14 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-06 01:37:01 Mike Frysinger napisaƂ(a): > On Monday, July 05, 2010 19:31:59 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > Only 84 ebuilds in the tree set NEED_PYTHON variable. NEED_PYTHON can be > > used only in EAPI <=2. python_pkg_setup() is optional in EAPI <=3. Exactly > > 0 ebuilds, wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio

2010-07-14 Thread Richard Freeman
On 07/14/2010 03:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part of the media. Most of the stuff in the media-* doesn't have anything to do with "the media" - whatever that is. M

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio

2010-07-14 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > All, > > > > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the > > category media-radio. > > > > Amateur Radio is not considered part of the m

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio

2010-07-14 Thread Thomas Beierlein
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the > category media-radio. > > Amateur Radio is not considered part of the media, so I would like to > propose renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possib

[gentoo-dev] rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio

2010-07-14 Thread William Hubbs
All, I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the category media-radio. Amateur Radio is not considered part of the media, so I would like to propose renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are th

[gentoo-dev] Re: [Survey || RFC] autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-14 Thread Vaeth
Sorry to post once again with the broken email headers, but I think I should remark on this. Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > - always pass --disable-dependency-tracking It is probably widely unknown that --disable-dependency-tracking has an unexpected side effect: It makes the "silent rules" feature o