[gentoo-dev] sys-libs/db, emerge and revdep-rebuild

2010-09-06 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
Hi there, I had a different problem with the db upgrade last week: postfix broke. I had to run revdep-rebuild to fix it; this is fine, except that nothing prompted me to run revdep-rebuild. So: - Am I expected to run revdep-rebuild after every emerge -uavDN world now? - If so, can we get more

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/db, emerge and revdep-rebuild

2010-09-06 Thread Zac Medico
On 09/06/2010 12:28 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: - Am I expected to run revdep-rebuild after every emerge -uavDN world now? Yes, that's always been the case. - If so, can we get more integration with emerge itself? I'd like us to add EAPI support for abi-slot dependencies, as discussed in these

[gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi, After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and editbugs user) perspective. These is the simplest set I have to start, but I'd really like other comments and ideas. 1. General case - You should

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in gnome-extra/hardware-monitor: ChangeLog hardware-monitor-1.4.3.ebuild

2010-09-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 07:30 +, Michael Weber (xmw) a écrit : xmw 10/09/06 07:30:05 Modified: ChangeLog Added:hardware-monitor-1.4.3.ebuild Log: Version bump to fix bug #328735 (Portage version: 2.1.8.3/cvs/Linux x86_64) [...] file :

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org: 2.2. Security bugs The developer should comment, but ONLY members of the security team should: - change whiteboard - add/remove arches As security may be grateful for any kind of help, those two actions is often done by the maintainers.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Alex Legler
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:39:59 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] 2.2. Security bugs  The developer should comment, but ONLY members of the security team  should:  - change whiteboard  - add/remove arches  - change bug status/reso The arches can still remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Michael Weber
On 09/06/2010 10:39 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:32, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and editbugs user) perspective.

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org: What about user issued KEYWORD/STABLE-REQ on maintainer-nee...@g.o assignd bugs/packages? Close as RESO/WONTFIX or add the arches? Common sense. Practice has been to add arches if it fixes a problem in a current stable, if there is no stable version

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs editbugs users

2010-09-06 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:39:59 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:32, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and