On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:53:22 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Pacho Ramos posted on Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:05:34 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > El mié, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-ran...@mail.ru escribió:
> >> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> >
Pacho Ramos posted on Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:05:34 +0200 as excerpted:
> El mié, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-ran...@mail.ru escribió:
>> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> > This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
>> >
>> > I feel it should m
El mié, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-ran...@mail.ru escribió:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
> >
> > I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and
> > that state is docum
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
>
> I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and
> that state is documented in the bug.
>
> If we keep every upstream bug open instead of closed,
> > 2.3. Upstream issues
> >
> >Do not close a bug (as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM) until it is fixed by
> >upstream.
>
> This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
>
> I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and
> that state is documented in the bug.
>
>
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:47:27PM +0200, Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
> 2.3. Upstream issues
>Do not close a bug (as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM) until it is fixed by
>upstream.
This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, an
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 08:32:16 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
[...]
> 2. Special cases
As a user I'd like to see following:
2.3. Upstream issues
Do not close a bug (as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM) until it is fixed by
upstream.
Robert
--
Robert Cernansky
E-mail: hslis...@zoznam.sk
Jabber: h...@ja
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 09:28 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> I had a different problem with the db upgrade last week: postfix
> broke. I had to run revdep-rebuild to fix it; this is fine, except
> that nothing prompted me to run revdep-rebuild. So:
>
> - Am I expected to ru
