On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:44:39 +0200
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > src_prepare() {
> > sed -i "/^OCAMLOPTFLAGS/s/$/ -ccopt \"\$(CFLAGS)
> > \$(LDFLAGS)\"/" Makefile }
>
> Make this sed line die, just in case.
Is your intention to die if it stops matching anything? sed won't throw an
error
On Friday 22 October 2010 14:44:39 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > DEPEND="sys-apps/gawk
> >
> > >=dev-lang/ocaml-3.08[ocamlopt]"
btw you need ocaml-3.10 for the ocamlopt useflag
A.
Hi,
On 02:33 Fri 22 Oct , Hanno Böck wrote:
> > We're good to have it in MISC-FREE ourselves, as redistribution and
> > everything else is free.
>
> Erh, no. MISC-FREE is for free and open source software and is more or less
> the same as Debians free software guideline. That's the whole pur
On 19:44 Fri 22 Oct , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Thomas Kahle (tomka)" :
> > tomka 10/10/22 15:11:40
> >
> > Added:metadata.xml pdfsandwich-0.0.2.ebuild
> > ChangeLog Log:
> > new ebuild: app-text/pdfsandwich
> > RDEPEND=" > media-gfx/exact-image
> >
Hi,
"Thomas Kahle (tomka)" :
> tomka 10/10/22 15:11:40
>
> Added:metadata.xml pdfsandwich-0.0.2.ebuild
> ChangeLog Log:
> new ebuild: app-text/pdfsandwich
> RDEPEND=" media-gfx/exact-image
> app-text/ghostscript-gpl"
>
> DEPEND="sys-apps/gawk
> >=dev-l
Hi,
Wernfried Haas :
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote:
> > I don't think there's a reason to do so. We have ddrescue, and users
> > should be encouraged to migrate to that.
>
> Ah, found it (sys-fs/ddrescue, not sys-fs/dd-rescue) and it actually
> does all the stuf
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote:
> I don't think there's a reason to do so. We have ddrescue, and users
> should be encouraged to migrate to that.
Ah, found it (sys-fs/ddrescue, not sys-fs/dd-rescue) and it actually
does all the stuff that dd-rhelp does.
I guess in th
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:50:21 +0200
Wernfried Haas wrote:
> I'd do it myself if i were ebuild maintainer (which i am not), but
> maybe someone could pick this up and just make a new ebuild for 0.1.2?
> Seems to be a quite simple job and whoever is willing to save this
> really useful tool will get
Hi,
while this is a tool i never like to use, it's really hand in case you
have it around.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:23:30AM +0200, Diego E. Pettenò wrote:
> # Obsolete even by upstream standard, since version 0.1.2
> # is out since 2007 (and has a version bump request in bug
> # #223299 since M
On Monday, October 18, 2010 11:15:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 18/10/2010 alle 17.10 +0200, Arfrever ha scritto:
> > No. It's not related to that bug.
>
> So I guess Mike's next reply is going to be "and what are you waiting
> for, before fixing it?". Seriously.
i guess the answe
# Diego E. Pettenò (22 Oct 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Obsolete even by upstream standard, since version 0.1.2
# is out since 2007 (and has a version bump request in bug
# #223299 since May 2008); uses “obsolete” tail/head
# syntax (bug #159606, the warning has since been removed
# from cor
# Diego E. Pettenò (22 Oct 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Outdated even by upstream standards (last version is 0.1.2,
# bug #223299 open May 2008); uses obsolete head/tail syntax
# (bug #159606); has maintainer-mode-triggered rebuild (bug
# #318487) without depending on autotools (and thus fai
12 matches
Mail list logo
