Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread Kfir Lavi
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Magnus Granberg posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:01:40 +0200 as excerpted: Display-If-Install: sys-devel/gcc-4.4 Typo: Display-If-Installed:                  ^^ Meanwhile, the title reflects hardened profiles, but the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Magnus Granberg wrote: Title: Info on GCC 4.4.4-r2 and GCC 3.X on Hardened profiles Too long. Maximum is 44 characters for the Title, according to GLEP 42. Revision: 1.1 This should always start with 1 (and it's one integer number) Display-If-Install:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread Magnus Granberg
On Sunday 24 October 2010 10.04.34 Kfir Lavi wrote: On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Magnus Granberg posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:01:40 +0200 as excerpted: Display-If-Install: sys-devel/gcc-4.4 Typo: Display-If-Installed: ^^

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread Kfir Lavi
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Magnus Granberg zo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2010 10.04.34 Kfir Lavi wrote: On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Magnus Granberg posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:01:40 +0200 as excerpted: Display-If-Install:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Magnus Granberg wrote: Display-If-Installed: sys-devel/gcc-4.4 and hardened If I understand portage's logic correctly, then this header will not work. But you can use Display-If-Installed for the dependency atom and Display-If-Profile for the profile. Headers of different

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread Magnus Granberg
On Sunday 24 October 2010 12.04.13 Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Magnus Granberg wrote: Display-If-Installed: sys-devel/gcc-4.4 and hardened If I understand portage's logic correctly, then this header will not work. But you can use Display-If-Installed for the dependency atom

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/php/files/eblits: src_configure-v1.eblit src_configure-v2.eblit

2010-10-24 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/24/2010 02:48 PM, Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote: mabi10/10/24 11:48:42 Modified: src_configure-v1.eblit src_configure-v2.eblit Log: enable pdo-sqlite via USE=sqlite3 not USE=sqlite (Portage version: 2.1.8.3/cvs/Linux x86_64) -

Re: [gentoo-dev] libnl v2.x

2010-10-24 Thread Kfir Lavi
Ok, I have filed a bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342461 Thanks, Kfir On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Serkan Kaba ser...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Please use Bugzilla to report and request version bumps. On 24-10-2010 15:40, Kfir

[gentoo-dev] libnl v2.x

2010-10-24 Thread Kfir Lavi
Hi Marcelo and dev's, Looking on libnl website, there is a new release of libnl. Currently supported versions are: [I] dev-libs/libnl Available versions: 0.5.0 1.0_pre6 ~1.0_pre6-r1 ~1.1 1.1-r1 ~1.1-r2 {doc} Installed versions: 1.1-r1(20:26:52 10/03/10) Homepage:

Re: [gentoo-dev] libnl v2.x

2010-10-24 Thread Serkan Kaba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Please use Bugzilla to report and request version bumps. On 24-10-2010 15:40, Kfir Lavi wrote: Hi Marcelo and dev's, Looking on libnl website, there is a new release of libnl. - -- Sincerely, Serkan KABA Gentoo Developer -BEGIN PGP

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/php/files/eblits: src_configure-v1.eblit src_configure-v2.eblit

2010-10-24 Thread Matti Bickel
On 10/24/2010 02:07 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 10/24/2010 02:48 PM, Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote: -phpconfutils_extension_with pdo-sqlite sqlite 1 /usr +phpconfutils_extension_with pdo-sqlite sqlite3 1 /usr That's a regression (because USE=sqlite3 is deprecated).

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 10/23/10 20:28, Magnus Granberg wrote: Hi Was thinking to post a news item for the hardened profile about the new GCC 4.4.4-r2 that have been stabled on x86 and amd64. Thank you for this milestone! We have enable SSP support by default on this and on newer versions for arches where

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: nauty

2010-10-24 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Friday 22 October 2010 schrieb Thomas Kahle: The nauty license *does* restrict the cost of redistribution. So what is it? An EULA? Then it's probably just nothing according to our icense-groups. We don't have any need to have every license in any license-group. EULA is for licenses where

Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch for python.eclass

2010-10-24 Thread Petteri Räty
On 10/23/2010 11:54 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: Subpatch #11 adds temporary support for EAPI=0 in python_get_implementational_package() to work around a part of bug #340395. This subpatch is very small, so I'm planning to commit it with the rest of subpatches. Please

Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch for python.eclass

2010-10-24 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-10-18 17:26:13 Petteri Räty napisał(a): On 10/18/2010 04:33 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: Subpatch #10 fixes exporting of python_pkg_setup() in EAPI =4. There will be other changes in API of python.eclass in EAPI =4, so python.eclass still doesn't support

Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch for python.eclass

2010-10-24 Thread Petteri Räty
On 10/24/2010 09:49 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2010-10-18 17:26:13 Petteri Räty napisał(a): On 10/18/2010 04:33 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: Subpatch #10 fixes exporting of python_pkg_setup() in EAPI =4. There will be other changes in API of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch for python.eclass

2010-10-24 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-10-24 20:54:56 Petteri Räty napisał(a): On 10/24/2010 09:49 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2010-10-18 17:26:13 Petteri Räty napisał(a): On 10/18/2010 04:33 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: Subpatch #10 fixes exporting of python_pkg_setup() in EAPI =4.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-cdr/cdemu: metadata.xml ChangeLog cdemu-1.3.0.ebuild

2010-10-24 Thread William Hubbs
Hi all, On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:45:01PM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: On 21.10.2010 10:30, Peter Volkov wrote: Nothing there applies here, since this USE flag has nothing to do with archs/profiles... which will force some users to use double negative (-nocdemud, i.e. no no cdemud) which is

[gentoo-dev] Removing .la files

2010-10-24 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, I'm doing some investigation on which .la files are still needed and which are not. In general, .la files only are in use by very few packages which use them to load plugins (I've seen no package which actually requires them for compile-time importing in production). For

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread Magnus Granberg
On Sunday 24 October 2010 19.00.44 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: On 10/23/10 20:28, Magnus Granberg wrote: Hi Was thinking to post a news item for the hardened profile about the new GCC 4.4.4-r2 that have been stabled on x86 and amd64. Thank you for this milestone! We have enable SSP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch for python.eclass

2010-10-24 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2010-10-24 21:22:24 napisał(a): 2010-10-24 20:54:56 Petteri Räty napisał(a): On 10/24/2010 09:49 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2010-10-18 17:26:13 Petteri Räty napisał(a): On 10/18/2010 04:33 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

[gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files

2010-10-24 Thread Duncan
Enrico Weigelt posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:09:30 +0200 as excerpted: I'm doing some investigation on which .la files are still needed and which are not. In general, .la files only are in use by very few packages which use them to load plugins (I've seen no package which actually requires

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files

2010-10-24 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:57:33PM +, Duncan wrote: Enrico Weigelt posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:09:30 +0200 as excerpted: I'm doing some investigation on which .la files are still needed and which are not. In general, .la files only are in use by very few packages which use them to

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-10-24 23h59 UTC

2010-10-24 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-10-24 23h59 UTC. Removals: net-firewall/ipp2p 2010-10-18 11:27:43 scarabeus sci-biology/mpiblast2010-10-18 11:31:12