Hi, On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:48 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: there was a very recent thread in this ml about these packages and the conclusion was that they fall to the pda herd. The proxy-user also asked for help and showed interest in working to become a developer. FYI work fluctuates for me - this and next week is busy (limited/no updates from me), then I have some free time again. Finding a new maintainer would be easiest, I've almost finished SynCE 0.15; becoming a dev would obviously take longer. Happy to hear suggestions, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au Man must shape his tools lest they shape him. -- Arthur R. Miller
On 11/05/2010 08:33 AM, Joshua Saddler wrote: On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:03:13 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (04 Nov 2010) # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz # Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access # Every package outdated, bug 340007 # Removal in 30 days app-pda/synce app-pda/synce-dccm app-pda/synce-fur app-pda/synce-gcemirror app-pda/synce-gnomevfs Replaced by synce-gvfs. app-pda/synce-gvfs app-pda/synce-hal app-pda/synce-kpm app-pda/synce-librapi2 Found upstream 0.15 also broken, missing #ifdef's for HAL all over. app-pda/synce-librra app-pda/synce-librtfcomp app-pda/synce-libsynce Saved this one for wine-doors as req. for orange. app-pda/synce-odccm app-pda/synce-pywbxml app-pda/synce-serial app-pda/synce-software-manager app-pda/synce-sync-engine app-pda/synce-trayicon app-pda/orange Saved this one for wine-doors. app-pda/libopensync-plugin-synce This sucks. *synce* stuff is covered in a our documentation, including a PDA guide and a debugging HowTo. Any chance of holding off on the mask/removal? Added longer removal date. 2011-01-01. Unfortunately 0.14 is in so bad shape there's nothing worth stabilizing for when every single package comes with missing depends, wrong python usage, other random bugs... and previous versions are even more of a mess.
On 11/05/2010 10:29 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: This sucks. *synce* stuff is covered in a our documentation, including a PDA guide and a debugging HowTo. Any chance of holding off on the mask/removal? Added longer removal date. 2011-01-01. Unfortunately 0.14 is in so bad shape there's nothing worth stabilizing for when every single package comes with missing depends, wrong python usage, other random bugs... and previous versions are even more of a mess. That means feel free to restrict the masks to 0.15 like libsynce is now, as proper ebuilds get committed to tree.
* Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org: Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote: If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period Longer than the typical 30 days? Alternatively I can move the packages from the perl herd to maintainer-needed and we wait until the replacement is finished... -- Regards Torsten
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:56:44 +0100 Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote: * Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org: Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote: If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period Longer than the typical 30 days? Ah, I misunderstood 'one week' there. 30 days are completely fine, and if that week meant the time before the mask is applied, I think I'll be able to do at least a pre-release to fill in the mask description. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
On 10:02 Tue 02 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote: Thanks to your help, we got enough ideas just in time to apply. We should hear Friday whether we're in. Unfortunately we weren't accepted. This was a highly selective set compared to GSoC -- only 20 organizations instead of 150. Perhaps next time around... -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com pgpNEzJFU1UYa.pgp Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: - - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be - - ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a supported server - - ewarn profile, please check the Hardened project (http://hardened.gentoo.org). As was stated a few times in this thread, simply dropping this ewarn without adding a warning somewhere that anyone looking for a production server profile should be looking at hardened, doesn't seem prudent to me. - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJM0J13AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPrEAP/3GNLyH67SLszchOL1wjvctE xEZ+yCDrTexXmc1A4YzqYKjVicTXgDdmIPThwD274YTGCfOqCzgOalcTqfHEu6X3 W3044m/YOHi1BeNpNXnLqdyleVFKtDs8YvsZkawUFIgyjMOQ0sKzetyORkk4QE4N 5kr6c4eGN36uIpe2P7viufgvgxAaJwP4k2xsVmVKOpMzGkGLmq8WNeeGTZZ4Jw9O LPD70gI+QBtgYYzqFMB5XMxA2ia4kYJibCrrzC9sqnRpfEStXXXSAWcjUn8aslOw +h4ITENwAqY/exRDLpTHXWpU5SzLz+UU9Y1BG8hKUtKEl++iVjFMn6GePRWjJHA8 mCmkRJ0ku4RscI73qhKjQQdxPEttfvvyfnaS5JdznJMJ/0MyvWV1MMV+j9eKprQq rAnRAZPbe1slh8Egnj2Cd4lik2L9ek3hAyLu0LEvW47IEJyi8LF5Z7ar9hN+ZJw5 IwV22/PYc5g/2Ukl+InHWXjtGrNWx7k3KD5D1O7pwkVnGo5ZRvj0AIgM3u7LWLBb llIFzf1boE6gFen2WgW+GvKngFtX4c8TqBvMLEBs17S3kESSEIzeqCBCuYqAVMEX vXO/En3NwlyiZ4bhfOOSgo3eQvclJKM6yCK6gDb8rfZFUptyIicQF1AkyFQw7mjN Y0UY+STLK4I0oW7bK3Sq =a9yz -END PGP SIGNATURE- I plan to commit my latest patch on Sunday night. Thanks -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 pgpq2uteppZyT.pgp Description: PGP signature
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (06 Nov 2010) # No longer maintained neither developed by upstream since # a lot of time. Nothing in the tree needs it (bug #344331) # Replaced by gnome-base/nautilus. Removal 2010-12-06. gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Looks like the new category is created and the packages are moved! If you have some issue with the pkgmoves, please reopen the tracker bug,open a new bug and make the tracker depends on it. Thanks guys! :) -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/