On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 19:45:12 James wrote:
> I think dev-python/dbus-python should be renamed dev-python/python-dbus
>
> Same with these:
> dev-libs/eggdbus
> dev-libs/e_dbus
>
> All the 'dbus' packages should start or end with 'dbus'.
no. the packages follow upstream naming convention
All,
gentoo policy states that if you want to make a change to a package, but
you find that it is maintained by someone else, you are supposed to
contact them and give them a reasonable chance to reply before you
change the packages they maintain unless you have a different
arrangement with them o
I think dev-python/dbus-python should be renamed dev-python/python-dbus
Same with these:
dev-libs/eggdbus
dev-libs/e_dbus
All the 'dbus' packages should start or end with 'dbus'.
# Justin Lecher (07 Dec 2010)
# Obsolete and superseeded by dev-tcltk/tclxml-3*
# bug 348024
dev-tcltk/tclxml-expat
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le mardi 07 décembre 2010 à 09:46 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis a écrit :
> Why does waf-utils_pkg_setup() call 'python_set_active_version 2'?
> What do you plan to do when there are packages using waf and supporting
> Python 3?
>
> http://code.google.com/p/waf/ says:
> "compatibilit
Why does waf-utils_pkg_setup() call 'python_set_active_version 2'?
What do you plan to do when there are packages using waf and supporting Python
3?
http://code.google.com/p/waf/ says:
"compatibility from Python 2.3 to 3.1 is maintained (and Jython 2.5)"
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-12-04 01:23:41 Sebastian Pipping napisał(a):
> Current situation
> =
> Without specifying USE_PYTHON in /etc/make.conf ebuilds based on the
> python eclass will install packages for no more ABIs than the two active
> versions on the 2.x and 3.x lines. To give an example: with
