On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:49:38 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> People seem to have started using blockers with package moves recently.
> For example, if cat/a is being moved to cat/b, people have started
> putting !cat/a as a dependency in cat/b. This is bad, for two reasons.
It's bad for a couple
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-01-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
xfce-extra/thunar-media-tags-plugin 2011-01-11 10:13:43 ssuominen
xfce-extra/thunar-vcs-plugin2011-01-11 10:13:44 ssuominen
xfce-extra/x
Hello!
I have just released genkernel 3.4.11 to the testing tree.
>From a high level point of view this release brings:
- Slightly faster startup
- Updated versions of busybox, LVM, e2fsprogs/blkid
- A few new features, e.g. GnuPG support
- A bunch of bug fixes (see below)
Below you can find de
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:05:22 +0100
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 1/16/11 2:49 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Second, when performing updates, Paludis also rewrites dependencies
> > of installed packages to use the names.
>
> This seems to imply that portage behaves differently. Should we update
On 1/16/11 2:49 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Second, when performing updates, Paludis also rewrites dependencies of
> installed packages to use the names.
This seems to imply that portage behaves differently. Should we update
PMS when we determine what's the correct behavior?
signature.asc
Desc
People seem to have started using blockers with package moves recently.
For example, if cat/a is being moved to cat/b, people have started
putting !cat/a as a dependency in cat/b. This is bad, for two reasons.
First, you shouldn't have to do that. If package moves aren't working,
we've got bigger
