Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)

2011-01-28 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:05:48 + Roy Bamford wrote: > Its not QAs decision, if the breakage was intentional or not. A > single body, in this case, QA, cannot be both the police and the > judicary. > > QA can and should be capable of finding wrongs, preventing further > damage and causing the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)

2011-01-28 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2011.01.28 23:03, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: [snip] > Only case where we don't want Devrel interfere with QA decision at > all > is when someone Intentionaly breaks main tree. Seriously if someone > really hit this issue i don't actually want him to apologize to > another > team and pretend like it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)

2011-01-28 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 28.1.2011 23:42, Rich Freeman napsal(a): > 2011/1/28 Tomáš Chvátal : >> So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff: >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff >> >> Please comment and help us improve the "english

Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)

2011-01-28 Thread Rich Freeman
2011/1/28 Tomáš Chvátal : > So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff > > Please comment and help us improve the "english" of the whole document > so it gets accepted :) My only general comments are: 1. It makes sens

[gentoo-dev] FYI: Moving packages from dev-php5 to dev-php

2011-01-28 Thread Matti Bickel
Hi all, this is a quick note that the php team (well, Ole and me) has decided to kill of the dev-php5 category. We think it's confusing and the distinction of which packages go where isn't as clear as it should be. I find myself regularly looking in dev-php instead of dev-php5. As php extensions (

[gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)

2011-01-28 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first off i would like to apologize for not sending this mail sooner (helluva week). So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff: http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff Please comment and help us improve the "e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Private SVN repository for live-ebuild

2011-01-28 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/28/2011 06:26 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 11:55 Thu 27 Jan , Zac Medico wrote: >> On 01/27/2011 11:08 AM, Matthew Summers wrote: >>> One question though. Since the 'portage' user has its $home set by default >>> to /var/tmp/portage how would you recommend handling the ssh key situatio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Private SVN repository for live-ebuild

2011-01-28 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Friday 28 of January 2011 15:26:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 11:55 Thu 27 Jan , Zac Medico wrote: > > On 01/27/2011 11:08 AM, Matthew Summers wrote: > > > One question though. Since the 'portage' user has its $home set by > > > default to /var/tmp/portage how would you recommend handling t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Private SVN repository for live-ebuild

2011-01-28 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 11:55 Thu 27 Jan , Zac Medico wrote: > On 01/27/2011 11:08 AM, Matthew Summers wrote: > > One question though. Since the 'portage' user has its $home set by default > > to /var/tmp/portage how would you recommend handling the ssh key situation > > since that directory is somewhat special? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of sparc-fbsd, amd64-fbsd

2011-01-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 01/28/2011 09:31 AM, Torsten Veller wrote: > Arch teams handle KEYWORDREQ bugs too. > > I have masked the only dev-lang/perl version keyworded for "sparc-fbsd" > 3 weeks ago. No user, no dev complained by now (#288028). > > So I think this arch (as much as amd64-fbsd) is unsupported/dead but >