tweaked the forums note a bit more to make clear that it is an optional
(additional) channel of communication only and does not replace g-dev
--- glep-0001.txt 5 Jun 2008 06:05:32 - 1.12
+++ glep-0001.txt 10 Mar 2011 00:09:46 -
@@ -85,10 +85,10 @@ gentoo-...@gentoo.org ma
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 17:43:49 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > before submitting it for review. A GLEP that has not been discussed on
> > -gentoo-...@gentoo.org and/or the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not
> > +gentoo-...@gentoo.org and the Gen
On Mar 9, 2011 5:45 PM, "Petteri Räty" wrote:
> Have GLEPs in practice been sent to the forums? I think this requirement
> could be dropped and just have a single place for discussion.
It says either is fine, so I wouldn't call it a requirement.
However, a GLEP update warrants at least one post
On 03/10/2011 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date. it
> talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymore.
> basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the
> Council. so rather
the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date. it
talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymore.
basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the
Council. so rather than confuse people (since we explicitly quiz people
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:13:50 AM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 9.3.2011 13:08, Alexis Ballier napsal(a):
> > On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:23:03 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> >> Dne 8.3.2011 15:51, Alexis Ballier napsal(a):
> >>> On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 09:28:13 AM Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wro
On 03/09/2011 06:08 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
Or maybe just piss me off ?
Please calm down. I would have taken some action too if it was in my bug
queue (via CC) and the primary maintainer didn't respond for 6 months.
It isn't flaming the users to respond and acknowledge their work but
poli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 9.3.2011 13:08, Alexis Ballier napsal(a):
> On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:23:03 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> Dne 8.3.2011 15:51, Alexis Ballier napsal(a):
>>> On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 09:28:13 AM Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus1
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:23:03 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 8.3.2011 15:51, Alexis Ballier napsal(a):
> > On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 09:28:13 AM Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> >> scarabeus11/03/08 12:28:13
> >>
> >> Modified: ChangeLog
> >> Added:libva
