Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Disabling locale at emerge output

2011-04-26 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:02:37 +0200 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:05:03 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: You want to force English on all our users because you can't be bothered to ask a reporter to repost an error message using LC_ALL=C? Are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: libexec directory inconsistency

2011-04-26 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:38:13 +0200 Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sonntag, 24. April 2011, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:43:16 +0200 Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote: Sounds like we should fix udev ebuild and some ebuilds installing udev rules to

Re: [gentoo-dev] TrueCrypt and it's lovely license

2011-04-26 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Seg, 2011-04-25 at 17:39 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Dane Smith wrote: These are all good enough reasons for me. Re-Restricted mirror and fetch in CVS. Maybe the description should be updated too. Free open-source disk encryption software is misleading, when

[gentoo-dev] Unmasking boost-1.46

2011-04-26 Thread Markos Chandras
Good evening fellow developers, Boost-1.46 is currently masked for testing. A number of packages fail to build against this version of boost[1]. However, this package is masked for too long and now it is time to unleash it to ~arch userland. I will unmask it on 2011-05-05 so you have pretty much

[gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for = dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). See attachment. Title: Upgrade to GLIB 2.28 Author: GNOME Team gn...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2011-04-26 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking boost-1.46

2011-04-26 Thread Maxim Koltsov
Are you planning to move to modular boost? I mean, separate ebuild for boost-filesystem, boost-spirit, etc. Maxim.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking boost-1.46

2011-04-26 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:16:06PM +0400, Maxim Koltsov wrote: Are you planning to move to modular boost? I mean, separate ebuild for boost-filesystem, boost-spirit, etc. Maxim. No plans for that. There is not enough time manpower to do it. Regards, -- Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for = dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Alex Alexander
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:56:06PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). See attachment. Should be wrapped at 72 chars, but looks good otherwise, thanks :) Title:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for = dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:56:06PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: You have 24 hours to comment on this news item.  Sorry to put it so bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). See attachment. Should

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2011-04-26 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On 04/26/2011 07:17 PM, Dane Smith (c1pher) wrote: c1pher 11/04/27 00:17:00 Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog Log: app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror: Updated maintainer info in metadata. Hmm, I was thinking about removing this package on behalf of mirror-admins, because

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for = dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: Can you link to the bug in the news item? Hmmm, not sure how relevant the polkit vulnerability is to the news item. It's supposed to be about setting mimetype handler information; not to explain the reason why glib is going