Re: [gentoo-dev] Git migration?

2011-05-03 Thread Alec Warner 
ask on the gentoo-scm list?

-A

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Andreas K. Huettel  wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I and maybe also some other people would be interested in the status of the
> infamous "git migration" of the main portage tree... I am just curious, since
> I have not heard much lately- is anything happening there, are we talking
> about months, years or never for getting out of the vcs stone age? :)
>
> I know that there is a tracker bug [1], but that one and its blockers have not
> seen much action lately (or ever). Also, browsing through the blockers, my
> personal impression is that at least several of them are actually
> enhancements, not really requirements...
>
> Any news?
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531
>
> --
>
> Andreas K. Huettel
> Gentoo Linux developer
> dilfri...@gentoo.org
> http://www.akhuettel.de/
>
>

[gentoo-dev] Git migration?

2011-05-03 Thread Andreas K. Huettel 

Hello everyone, 

I and maybe also some other people would be interested in the status of the 
infamous "git migration" of the main portage tree... I am just curious, since 
I have not heard much lately- is anything happening there, are we talking 
about months, years or never for getting out of the vcs stone age? :)

I know that there is a tracker bug [1], but that one and its blockers have not 
seen much action lately (or ever). Also, browsing through the blockers, my 
personal impression is that at least several of them are actually 
enhancements, not really requirements...

Any news?

Cheers, 
Andreas

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531

-- 

Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer 
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-03 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò 
Il giorno mar, 03/05/2011 alle 17.53 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." ha
scritto:
> 
> 
> See
> 
>  

Don't know the specifics of the package, but if it's a binary package,
then glibc is not considered an implicit system dependency: you want to
explicit that uclibc/freebsd-libc and so on do not work for the package.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-03 Thread Mike Gilbert 
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:53 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
 wrote:
> On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
>> In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc.
>
> See
> 
>
>> Why sys-devel/gcc don't have a library version without the actual compiler?
>
> This question may be a bit hard to understand, at least for me.
>
>

Other distros package libstdc++ separately from gcc. On Gentoo, the
one package (sys-devel/gcc) provides both.

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-03 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr. 
On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc.

See


> Why sys-devel/gcc don't have a library version without the actual compiler?

This question may be a bit hard to understand, at least for me.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-03 Thread Kfir Lavi 
Hi,
I'm trying to build a small system that installs just the needed libraries.
One of the programs is ACE libs.
ldd shows:
(hardend) goofy catalyst # ldd /usr/lib/libACE-6.0.1.so
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xa2782000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xa25bd000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xa25b9000)
libstdc++.so.6 =>
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/libstdc++.so.6 (0xa24bd000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xa2496000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xa231)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/libgcc_s.so.1
(0xa22f6000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xa22dc000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xa2783000)

In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc.
...
COMMON_DEPEND="dev-libs/openssl"
# TODO probably more
RDEPEND="${COMMON_DEPEND}
X? ( x11-libs/libXt x11-libs/libXaw )"

DEPEND="${COMMON_DEPEND}
X? ( x11-proto/xproto )"
...

I have added virtual/libc sys-devel/gcc to RDEPEND, but this will install
gcc.
I would like to avoid installing gcc, and would like to install just the
libraries.
Is this approach correct?
Why sys-devel/gcc don't have a library version without the actual compiler?

Regards,
Kfir

[gentoo-dev] Web-design help request

2011-05-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz 
Hi all,

If anyone with web-design skills could help out on some improvements to 
our website, please get in touch with me off-list or on IRC in
#gentoo-pr.

One of this year's GSoC students (tampakrap) will be rewriting a bunch 
of the backend website code, which is a great opportunity for us to also 
fix some of the frontend usability issues.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Team lead, public relations
Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.com


pgpfcuG38Min8.pgp
Description: PGP signature