On 25 June 2011 00:57, Nathan Phillip Brink wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:57:47PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote:
>>
>> media
>> video
>> kde
>> editors
>>
>
I'm strongly of the mind that by making the tag system arbitrarily
flat, you might be prematurely limiting yourself, as well as risking a
On 25 June 2011 00:51, Nathan Phillip Brink wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:20:40PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote:
>> I bring this up because there are several packages with the same name
>> and different qualification. Obviously, they'll have different tags
>> because they're not the same thing, bu
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:35:33 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> git-2.eclass is in the tree for a while now, and there's still awful
> lot of packages using old & deprecated git.eclass.
Ah, and sorry, I forgot to mention bug 372909 [1]. This bug can be used
to track the packages updated to use git-2.ec
Hello,
git-2.eclass is in the tree for a while now, and there's still awful
lot of packages using old & deprecated git.eclass.
Why migrate?
- git-2 supports fallback SRC_URIs -- you can set it to prefer git://
but fallback to http:// if git is unreachable (e.g. due to firewall),
- git-2 is clea
В Птн, 24/06/2011 в 18:22 +0200, Jeroen Roovers пишет:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:29:51 +0400
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>
> > > src_prepare() {
> > > echo "./logos/gentoo.logo" >> logo_config
> > > echo "./logos/gentoo2.logo" >> logo_config
> > > echo "./logos/banner-simplified.logo" >> logo_conf
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:29:51 +0400
Peter Volkov wrote:
> > src_prepare() {
> > echo "./logos/gentoo.logo" >> logo_config
> > echo "./logos/gentoo2.logo" >> logo_config
> > echo "./logos/banner-simplified.logo" >> logo_config
> > echo "./logos/banner.logo" >> logo_config
> > ec
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:57:47PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> Tags are basically keywords you can use to describe packages, allowing
> you to easily search and explore your options based on what the
> packages actually does (if we want to get technical, anything that
> identifies a package is a sort
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:20:40PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> I bring this up because there are several packages with the same name
> and different qualification. Obviously, they'll have different tags
> because they're not the same thing, but neither should they share the
> same directory. So the
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
> There's no reason that a dozen of packages PDEPENDs on
> bash-completion. If one decides not to use bash-completion any
> longer, I don't see a reason to rebuild all those packages just to
> get rid of one PDEPEND (and a single file).
The question
On 24 June 2011 20:14, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:51, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
>> If you abolish categories in favour of tags, but tags don't uniquely
>> identify a package, how do you uniquely identify a package?
>>
>> Remember that your solution has to work with overlays and
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:51, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> If you abolish categories in favour of tags, but tags don't uniquely
> identify a package, how do you uniquely identify a package?
>
> Remember that your solution has to work with overlays and with tags
> being changed after a package is inst
2011/6/24 Ciaran McCreesh :
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:52:03 +0200
> Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
>> You might not like it, but Gentoo categories have always been
>> directories, not words into metadata.xml.
>
> So tags are in some way related to categories then?
For me, tags would be an abstra
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:52:03 +0200
Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
> You might not like it, but Gentoo categories have always been
> directories, not words into metadata.xml.
So tags are in some way related to categories then?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2011/6/24 Zac Medico :
> On 06/22/2011 11:15 PM, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
>> Symlinks are clean, and portage has
>> always been file-oriented so I see no problem with using them for
>> this. All we need is to deference the symlink to find the real name of
>> the package and put it in world
On 6/24/11 9:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> For the additional dependency, I'd put it in some common ebuild (like
> bash, or something without compiled binaries -- even better) and I'd
> put the flag there.
>
> There's no reason that a dozen of packages PDEPENDs on bash-completion.
> If one decides
On 06/23/2011 05:07 PM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:14, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
>> First: how do tags relate to categories? Are they independent, a
>> refinement or a replacement?
>>
> I would suggest they be a replacement because categories are just an
> overly limited subset o
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:05:59 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
> >> --- Comment #2 from Gilles Dartiguelongue
> >> 2011-06-21 09:35:59 UTC --- Afaik, the bash-completion eclass adds
> >> the use flag only to make sure the user has bash-comple
17 matches
Mail list logo
