# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (25 Jul 2011)
# No new release since 2002, doesn't respect LDFLAGS and
# still needing old libsigc++:1.0. Removal in 30 days. (#358589)
net-libs/libicq2000
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (25 Jul 2011)
# Old and unmaintained for a long time, bug #358587.
# Removal in 30 days
=dev-libs/libsigc++-1.0*
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote:
So go claim your commits,
Great work!
[1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
[2]
http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
It appears they count rather more commits than does
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote:
So go claim your commits,
Great work!
[1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
[2]
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote:
So go claim your commits,
Great work!
[1]
On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote:
So go claim your commits,
Great work!
[1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
[2]