[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-libs/libicq2000
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (25 Jul 2011) # No new release since 2002, doesn't respect LDFLAGS and # still needing old libsigc++:1.0. Removal in 30 days. (#358589) net-libs/libicq2000 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-libs/libsigc++:1.0
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (25 Jul 2011) # Old and unmaintained for a long time, bug #358587. # Removal in 30 days =dev-libs/libsigc++-1.0* signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote: So go claim your commits, Great work! [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo [2] http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest commits look to be the likely cause. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote: So go claim your commits, Great work! [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo [2] http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest commits look to be the likely cause. Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another commit free with every ebuild commit! -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote: So go claim your commits, Great work! [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo [2] http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest commits look to be the likely cause. Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another commit free with every ebuild commit! The Manifest commit is done anyway, whether your GPG signature is added or not. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org wrote: So go claim your commits, Great work! [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo [2] http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest commits look to be the likely cause. Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another commit free with every ebuild commit! Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to change as soon as it is committed. -- Thanks, Zac
