On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10:00 Tue 20 Sep , Corentin Chary wrote:
Could someone write ebuilds for euscan and euscanwww ? It should not
take a lot of time, but my ebuilds skills are probably not good
enought to do that.
Sounds like
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:46:10 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
0001 - i had reason to put local definitions on the top, it is way
more readable to see right away what local vars function has, so
please stick to it.
0007 - I placed it into the conditionals to be clear what is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/21/11 11:57, Corentin Chary wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Donnie Berkholz
dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10:00 Tue 20 Sep , Corentin Chary wrote:
Could someone write ebuilds for euscan and euscanwww ? It
should not take a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/21/11 11:57, Corentin Chary wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Donnie Berkholz
dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10:00 Tue 20 Sep , Corentin Chary wrote:
On 14:20 Tue 20 Sep , Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:16:46PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
OK, so the implication of what you're saying is that everything in
eutils.eclass, base.eclass, toolchain-funcs.eclass,
flag-o-matic.eclass, versionator.eclass, multilib.eclass,
Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a complete eclass
for convenience.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:32:52 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
10 -- tries to migrate git.eclass clones to git-2.eclass (#383761).
Fixed invalid output (PVR - PF).
11 -- removes old git.eclass
El mié, 21-09-2011 a las 04:00 +, Duncan escribió:
Patrick Lauer posted on Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:00:38 +0200 as excerpted:
On 09/20/11 15:09, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What do you guys think?
I haven't ever tried it but, what would occur if that people with
really updated systems simply
2011/9/20 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
The issue here is that if some part of the tree looses lots of its
maintainers we as devs usually manage to shape it up enough for us in
testing but nobody ever bothers to wait that 30 days and open
stablereq.
An issue your suggestion doesn't
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:46:38 -0400 as excerpted:
An issue your suggestion doesn't address is when packages don't even
stick around 30 days/etc.
I know I've seen many packages where there is an ancient stable version
that is never touched, and a much newer ~arch version
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Talking about... Just today I was reading that the firefox folks are
debating shortening the current 6-week cycle to 5-weeks or less.
Upstream issues are a whole different kettle of fish, but obviously
still cause problems.
On 10:30 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I uploaded my script for finding reverse dependencies here:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=summary
app-portage/tatt does that for some time already. It reads the list
from the tinderbox website and then uses eix
Hi!
On 20:42 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 09/19/11 20:30, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I uploaded my script for finding reverse dependencies here:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=summary
Advantages over existing solutions (browsing to websites
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14:20 Tue 20 Sep , Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:16:46PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
OK, so the implication of what you're saying is that everything in
eutils.eclass, base.eclass,
On 09:10 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
'$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves.
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:10:27 -0400 as excerpted:
Plus at least with firefox the old versions don't suddenly stop
working/etc, assuming they still get upstream security notices.
That's the thing. AFAIK, they don't. FF4 is still getting them I
believe, due to longer term
On 12:10 Wed 21 Sep 2011, Rich Freeman wrote:
Maybe we need to rethink the definition of stable in these
situations. I think it still doesn't hurt to have some kind of QA
cycle internally for something like firefox. Plus at least with
firefox the old versions don't suddenly stop working/etc,
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:36:57 Thomas Kahle wrote:
On 09:10 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I agree that these new 'channel' concepts are not very compatible with
out stable/testing tree model and security stabilizations. Every single
stabilization (except the first) of www-client/chromium for instance is
a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Let's have a page in our docs where everybody can explain his or her
tool. Where in the hierarchy should the page be? How about:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/arch-testing
Please! And the documentation should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/21/11 20:40, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Let's have a page in our docs where everybody can explain his or
her tool. Where in the hierarchy should the page be? How
about:
since there's been no new feedback in a while, i'll add this to eutils.eclass
in a while:
usex() { use $1 echo ${2-yes}$4 || echo ${3-no}$5 ; }
then once it hits the PMS, i'll put EAPI wrapping around it.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 13:37 Wed 21 Sep 2011, Rich Freeman wrote:
I LIKE the contribution of linux distros, and I don't really want to
see a move towards the Windows world where I have 10 different
auto-updaters running (or worse - no auto-update and I'm just stuck
with manual checks). I also don't like every
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is a bit hard to document a generic testing process. Each package
has different requirements. We tried to document a generic workflow in
amd64 AT[1] and in the AT quiz as well.
Sure, and that's pretty much the
23 matches
Mail list logo
