[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-libs/wt

2011-12-13 Thread Peter Volkov 
net-libs/wt library was added to the tree for net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp. Later
upstream decided not to use it and net-libs/wt left unmaintained. Now it
is broken and requires version bump. If anybody is interested in this
library, please, take it. If nobody steps in next month I'll drop it
from the tree.

--
Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] dropping of eutils.eclass check_license

2011-12-13 Thread Mike Frysinger 
On Tuesday 13 December 2011 17:18:29 Brian Harring wrote:
> When you punt it, might as well integrate the `ifndef EUTILS_IMPORTED
> ... `
> bit in the process...

i've been adding that to a few eclasses at a time on the pessimistic view that 
if something breaks, it'll be easier to figure out what it was

that said, {eutils,games}.eclass will prob be committed tomorrow ... i've 
merged all the others
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] dropping of eutils.eclass check_license

2011-12-13 Thread Brian Harring 
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:20:51PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that portage has ACCEPT_LICENSE support natively, we can go ahead and 
> drop 
> the manual check_license logic from all ebuilds/eclasses

When you punt it, might as well integrate the `ifndef EUTILS_IMPORTED 
... ` 
bit in the process...
~brian

[gentoo-dev] dropping of eutils.eclass check_license

2011-12-13 Thread Mike Frysinger 
now that portage has ACCEPT_LICENSE support natively, we can go ahead and drop 
the manual check_license logic from all ebuilds/eclasses
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-13 Thread Mike Frysinger 
On Monday 12 December 2011 17:47:54 Francesco Riosa wrote:
> not there yet, I was looking for this:
> 
> git clone https://github.com/hjl-tools/linux.git
> git checkout hjl/x32/lfs/v3.1

sorry, i didn't realize that's what you were looking for.  i mentioned it in 
the summary which is a parent of this e-mail ...

http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_e99aa2a9476bf9cf8385c131b96d5a75.xml
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-editors/emacs:21 and app-editors/emacs:22

2011-12-13 Thread Michał Górny 
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:40:24 +0100
Ulrich Mueller  wrote:

> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> 
> >> # Ulrich Mueller  (13 Dec 2011)
> >> # SLOTs 21 and 22 of app-editors/emacs, corresponding to
> >> # GNU Emacs versions 21.4 and 22.3. These versions were
> >> # released in February 2005 and September 2008, respectively.
> >> # Please upgrade to app-editors/emacs-23.3 and update your
> >> # Emacs Lisp packages with emacs-updater.
> >> # Masked for removal in 60 days, or after the release of
> >> # GNU Emacs 24.1, whatever will occur later. Bug 394589.
> >> =app-editors/emacs-21*
> >> =app-editors/emacs-22*
> >>  
> > May I quote my mentor fauli here:
> 
> > "If you need a fast emacs clone, why not use emacs-21 ?"
> 
> Heh, we still keep app-editors/emacs:18 which is even faster. ;-)
> And much simpler [1].

Or maybe app-editors/vim while we're already at it?

/me hides.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-editors/emacs:21 and app-editors/emacs:22

2011-12-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller 
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Thomas Kahle wrote:

>> # Ulrich Mueller  (13 Dec 2011)
>> # SLOTs 21 and 22 of app-editors/emacs, corresponding to
>> # GNU Emacs versions 21.4 and 22.3. These versions were
>> # released in February 2005 and September 2008, respectively.
>> # Please upgrade to app-editors/emacs-23.3 and update your
>> # Emacs Lisp packages with emacs-updater.
>> # Masked for removal in 60 days, or after the release of
>> # GNU Emacs 24.1, whatever will occur later. Bug 394589.
>> =app-editors/emacs-21*
>> =app-editors/emacs-22*
>>  May I quote my mentor fauli here:

> "If you need a fast emacs clone, why not use emacs-21 ?"

Heh, we still keep app-editors/emacs:18 which is even faster. ;-)
And much simpler [1].

> (I'm not saying they should not be removed).

Ulrich

[1]

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-editors/emacs:21 and app-editors/emacs:22

2011-12-13 Thread Thomas Kahle 
On 19:54 Tue 13 Dec 2011, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> # Ulrich Mueller  (13 Dec 2011)
> # SLOTs 21 and 22 of app-editors/emacs, corresponding to
> # GNU Emacs versions 21.4 and 22.3. These versions were
> # released in February 2005 and September 2008, respectively.
> # Please upgrade to app-editors/emacs-23.3 and update your
> # Emacs Lisp packages with emacs-updater.
> # Masked for removal in 60 days, or after the release of
> # GNU Emacs 24.1, whatever will occur later. Bug 394589.
> =app-editors/emacs-21*
> =app-editors/emacs-22*
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-editors/emacs:21 and app-editors/emacs:22

2011-12-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller 
# Ulrich Mueller  (13 Dec 2011)
# SLOTs 21 and 22 of app-editors/emacs, corresponding to
# GNU Emacs versions 21.4 and 22.3. These versions were
# released in February 2005 and September 2008, respectively.
# Please upgrade to app-editors/emacs-23.3 and update your
# Emacs Lisp packages with emacs-updater.
# Masked for removal in 60 days, or after the release of
# GNU Emacs 24.1, whatever will occur later. Bug 394589.
=app-editors/emacs-21*
=app-editors/emacs-22*