Re: [gentoo-dev] Six month major project on Gentoo

2011-12-19 Thread Sébastien Fabbro
Gaurav Saxena wrote: > I am interested in doing my final year computer scence project on gentoo. I > would be having a duration of six months to work on the project. Could you > please suggest me some good project ideas that would be helpful to me as > well as gentoo. I am interested in parallel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Six month major project on Gentoo

2011-12-19 Thread Christian Ruppert
On Thursday 15 December 2011 23:37:10 Gaurav Saxena wrote: > Hello all , Thanks a lot for your replies. > > Christian, I am interested in Open RC, it sounds interesting to me, I > would like to know more details regarding what type of projects are > there that could be done. > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Duncan
Ulrich Mueller posted on Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:23:59 +0100 as excerpted: >> I think that this change, similarly to the automatic .la file fixing, >> could be implemented by portage without waiting for a new EAPI. > > Not sure about this one. It's not Portage only, but affects all package > managers

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Duncan
Dale posted on Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:48:27 -0600 as excerpted: > Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: >>> The problem is that ($PN, $CATEGORY) pairs are not unique. >> Thinking about it a little more, I believe that ${CATEGORY} shouldn't >> appear anywhere in th

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:31:35 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 03:41 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > For completeness, could you post a list of packages that would > > benefit from your proposed changes? It's a little thing called > > scope. :) > > I cannot provide you t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-12-2011 a las 09:31 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:07:45 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > El dom, 18-12-2011 a las 23:02 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > > [...] > > > > Q6: Why can't the dodoc/dohtml path be changed before EAPI-5? > > > > A6: Because the path wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Stelian Ionescu
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 05:23 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > > >> Can we please avoid the bloat of another directory level here? > >> ${CATEGORY}/${PN} will be even longer than ${PF} in most cases. > > > The problem is that ($PN, $CATEGORY) p

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:02:07 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Shifting is unavoidable. SLOTs can change, categories can change, > package names can change. We should really just abolish updates and handle changes by reinstalls plus blockers. Updates are a huge pain, they cause all kinds of problems an

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:41:00 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > Using /usr/share/doc/$PN-$SLOT with exceptions for packages that have > the same ($PN, $SLOT) but different categories would not scale: it > turns out there are >100 of them in the main tree. And I hope there will be more. We shoul

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:23:08 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > 2. It doesn't play well with bash completion. When searching for >documentation of a specific package (and only knowing PN), one can >currently type the pathname up to PN and press tab which will >complete PVR. With CATEGORY _

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:07:45 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 18-12-2011 a las 23:02 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > [...] > > > Q6: Why can't the dodoc/dohtml path be changed before EAPI-5? > > > A6: Because the path where dodoc and dohtml install files is part > > > of the PMS. Portage can't

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > I am forced to agree with your points #1 and #2. Good. :-) > $CATEGORY/$PN-$SLOT is optimized for the "bookmark a document and go > back to it a week later" use case, but you are correct that it would > work poorly for the "quickly look up