On 12/28/2011 05:12 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Disclaimer: this is just one idea that come at lunch, and sharing (in
a short pause before my demanding daughter request me) here to not
forget in the next busy days.
Seem to me that append a time slice to the function, in the name or as
a
On 12/28/2011 05:12 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Seem to me that append a time slice to the function, in the name or as
a parent function that call the underling function can solve most of
the versioning/deprecation problems
I've overheard Arfrever discussing a similar approach in funtoo's irc
2011/12/28 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org:
On 12/28/2011 05:12 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Disclaimer: this is just one idea that come at lunch, and sharing (in
a short pause before my demanding daughter request me) here to not
forget in the next busy days.
Seem to me that append a time slice
2011/12/28 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org:
On 12/28/2011 05:12 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Seem to me that append a time slice to the function, in the name or as
a parent function that call the underling function can solve most of
the versioning/deprecation problems
I've overheard Arfrever
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 02:37:07AM +, Francesco Riosa wrote:
2011/12/28 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org:
On 12/28/2011 05:12 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Seem to me that append a time slice to the function, in the name or as
a parent function that call the underling function can solve most
