Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Dale
Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:20:30 -0800 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 02/10/2012 06:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 >>> Hilco Wijbenga wrote: >>> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle],

[gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:20:30 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > On 02/10/2012 06:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 > > Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > > > >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > >> #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle], required by gnutls (ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh

2012-02-10 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 02/10/2012 05:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > # Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012) > # Unmaintained. If you want it take and bump it > # Bug #386339 > app-shells/ksh > > I'll take a crack at this. I've been supporting a Windows application that used MKS Korn shell for a decade or so, so its kind

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 02/10/2012 06:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 > Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: >> #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle], required by gnutls (argument) >>> =dev-libs/nettle-2.4 gmp > > I've been tripped up by t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 10 February 2012 18:17, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 > Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: >> #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle], required by gnutls (argument) >> >=dev-libs/nettle-2.4 gmp > > I've been tripped up by

[gentoo-dev] Re: The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle], required by gnutls (argument) > >=dev-libs/nettle-2.4 gmp I've been tripped up by this in the past. Can we change the order of the lines

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-laptop/thinkpad app-laptop/tpctl app-laptop/configure-thinkpad

2012-02-10 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained. Does not build with recent kernels. Bug #381263 # Replacement: app-laptop/tp_smapi # Removal in 30 days app-laptop/thinkpad app-laptop/tpctl app-laptop/configure-thinkpad Regards, Markos Chandras / Ge

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh

2012-02-10 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained. If you want it take and bump it # Bug #386339 app-shells/ksh - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/{libdsk,lib765}

2012-02-10 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012) # No maintainer. Does not build. Bug #402857 # Removal in 30 days app-emulation/libdsk app-emulation/lib765 - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ver

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 10 February 2012 11:29, Zac Medico wrote: > On 02/10/2012 11:23 AM, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith wrote: >>> The line above is not prompting you to turn on the nettle use flag, which >>> appears to already be on.  It's prompting you to add the gmp use flag f

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 02/10/2012 11:23 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith wrote: >> The line above is not prompting you to turn on the nettle use flag, which >> appears to already be on. It's prompting you to add the gmp use flag for >> dev-libs/nettle. > > Which looks like it's o

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/10/2012 06:50 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > Hi all, > > I am about to upgrade gnutls. Given the output below: > > centaur ~ # emerge gnutls -vp > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! [

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith wrote: > The line above is not prompting you to turn on the nettle use flag, which > appears to already be on.  It's prompting you to add the gmp use flag for > dev-libs/nettle. Which looks like it's on as well. In either case -- this isn't gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread ross smith
> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle], required by gnutls (argument) > >=dev-libs/nettle-2.4 gmp > > So I added the nettle USE flag. I tried both package.use and make.conf > but it doesn't seem to make any difference: Portage keeps givi

[gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
Hi all, I am about to upgrade gnutls. Given the output below: centaur ~ # emerge gnutls -vp These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N ] dev-libs/nettle-2.4 USE="gmp ssl" 1,051 kB [ebuild U ] net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16 [2.10.5] USE