On 30-03-2012 13:00:33 +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
This is from gnustep-base.eclass:
egnustep_doc() {
if [[ -d ./Documentation ]] ; then
# Check documentation presence
cd ${S}/Documentation
if [[ -f ./[mM]akefile || -f ./GNUmakefile ]] ; then
Walter Dnes posted on Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:08:08 -0400 as excerpted:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:26:22PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote
Though of course, if anybody has custom stuff in say,
/usr/portage/local/
which they make by hand, nuking /usr/portage will make you *Very*
unpopular.
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:26:22PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote
Though of course, if anybody has custom stuff in say, /usr/portage/local/
which they make by hand, nuking /usr/portage will make you *Very*
unpopular.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:55:27 -0400
Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we
declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I
think claiming 2.0 would be merited, if only for the attention it
would draw at
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Looks then that there are several alternatives for portage tree, then,
maybe the option would be to add a note to Gentoo Handbook explaining
the cons of having portage tree on a standard partition and, then, put a
link to a wiki page
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:56:22AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Do you really want to be advertising an awful hack that doesn't really
work, is conceptually unsound and that breaks all kinds of things in
subtle ways?
Isn't that something all major distributions do? ;-)
Sven
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:59:10 +0200
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
echo 'import Distribution.Simple; main = defaultMainWithHooks
defaultUserHooks' \
$setupdir/Setup.hs
}
I think there should be || die after echo, to catch out-of-disk-space
problems.
Ok :]
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:44:02AM +, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Looks then that there are several alternatives for portage tree, then,
maybe the option would be to add a note to Gentoo Handbook explaining
the cons of having
# Masked for removal, use sys-apps/hardened-shadow instead.
# Needs too much special patching to work in Gentoo,
# bugs: #371167, #408647. Removal in 60 days (31 May 2012).
sys-auth/tcb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
boxes for years without any issues :)
...and here we see the problem. You
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
boxes
On 03/31/12 17:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
boxes for years without any
On 03/31/2012 01:06 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
Alex Alexanderalex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:52:53 +0100 as excerpted:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 Alex Alexander
alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
On Mar 31, 2012 12:57 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
(or hand me powers to remove people from ML :-)
That sounds like a great idea. We could create a code of conduct, and
then designate individuals to enforce it. Maybe we should call them
proctors:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Maciej Grela wrote:
I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable
is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not.
There is no such stage. You mean pkg_pretend, I suppose?
Therefore I ask, what is the proper behaviour here ? Is there
El sáb, 31-03-2012 a las 08:44 +, Sven Vermeulen escribió:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Looks then that there are several alternatives for portage tree, then,
maybe the option would be to add a note to Gentoo Handbook explaining
the cons of having portage
El sáb, 31-03-2012 a las 02:35 -0700, Brian Harring escribió:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:44:02AM +, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Looks then that there are several alternatives for portage tree, then,
maybe the option would be to
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:08:29 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
No. I didn't say I think it works, I said I have proof it works.
Well that's interesting, because there are plenty of examples where it
doesn't work, and all that it takes to disprove a theory is a single
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 03:06:36 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with preserved-libs (and emerge --jobs, for that
matter) is that the design is I can think of a few ways where it
might break, so I'll hard-code in special cases to handle those,
but in general I can't
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:00:00 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Good enough is the worst enemy of perfect.
While we have s 98% solution that doesn't handle all corner cases you
have a theoretical construct in your brain that might in theory cover
100% of all cases, but it's in
On 03/31/12 23:01, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:00:00 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Good enough is the worst enemy of perfect.
While we have s 98% solution that doesn't handle all corner cases you
have a theoretical construct in your brain that might in
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:07:04 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you have a ten components, each of which 98% work, your overall
system is 80% reliable. If you have twenty such components, it's
down to 66% reliable. You're rapidly entering when it breaks,
reinstall territory
Am Samstag, den 31.03.2012, 14:44 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Maciej Grela wrote:
I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable
is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not.
There is no such stage. You mean pkg_pretend, I suppose?
On Mar 31, 2012 5:57 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:08:29 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
No. I didn't say I think it works, I said I have proof it works.
Well that's interesting, because there are plenty of examples
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:30:07 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
So you think Gentoo should advertise as the chances of it working
are greater than 0%?
I said better ... not repetitive trolls.
If you cared about making things better you'd spend more time writing
patches and
On 03/31/12 23:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:30:07 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
So you think Gentoo should advertise as the chances of it working
are greater than 0%?
I said better ... not repetitive trolls.
If you cared about making things better you'd
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:39:21 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2012 5:57 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:08:29 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
No. I didn't say I think it works, I said I
On 03/31/2012 04:49 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:52:53 +0100 as excerpted:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 Alex Alexander
alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already.
On 30 March 2012 14:25, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Back to year 2009?
http://www.gentoo.org/news/20091004-gentoo-10-years.xml
That never stopped anyone before
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_X-2
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:59:00 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
I wouldn't care if it weren't the fact your gentoo dev posts
generally consist of xyz is stupid, as is the people behind it
whether it be portage, udev, council, etc, take your pick.
No, what I
On 03/31/2012 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
About the wiki page, I can only document reiserfs+tail usage as it's the
one I use and I know, about other alternatives like using squashfs, loop
mount... I cannot promise anything as I simply don't know how to set
them.
Squashfs is really simple to
Hello.
It seems that in eclasses we have two differenct environment variables
with same meaning ESCM and EVCS OFFLINE. Some of eclasses use one and
some another:
find . -type f | xargs grep -l EVCS_OFFLINE
./git-2.eclass
./bzr.eclass
find . -type f | xargs grep -l ESCM_OFFLINE
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:49:07 +0400
Alexander V Vershilov alexander.vershi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
It seems that in eclasses we have two differenct environment variables
with same meaning ESCM and EVCS OFFLINE. Some of eclasses use one and
some another:
find . -type f | xargs grep -l
On 31.03.2012 20:49, Alexander V Vershilov wrote:
Hello.
It seems that in eclasses we have two differenct environment variables
with same meaning ESCM and EVCS OFFLINE. Some of eclasses use one and
some another:
find . -type f | xargs grep -l EVCS_OFFLINE
./git-2.eclass
./bzr.eclass
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Tiziano Müller wrote:
The spec seems to be clear that T is legal in all phases, including
pkg_pretend.
Well, I'd say: there is no sane value you can assign to $T since you
are not allowed to write anything anyway:
pkg_pretend must not write to the filesystem.
2012/3/31 Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org:
Am Samstag, den 31.03.2012, 14:44 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Maciej Grela wrote:
I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable
is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not.
There is no such
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/31/2012 10:52 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 Alex Alexander
alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO
it should be in stable already. I've been using it
On 03/31/2012 01:56 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Tiziano Müller wrote:
and since pkg_pretend is run separately from the main phase
function sequence, and does not participate in any kind of
environment saving it is not guaranteed to be set to the same $T
later.
The
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:42:50AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote
On 03/31/2012 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
About the wiki page, I can only document reiserfs+tail usage as it's the
one I use and I know, about other alternatives like using squashfs, loop
mount... I cannot promise anything as I
On 03/31/2012 04:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:42:50AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote
On 03/31/2012 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
About the wiki page, I can only document reiserfs+tail usage as it's the
one I use and I know, about other alternatives like using squashfs, loop
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:37:15PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Paweł Hajdan,
43 matches
Mail list logo
