Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: several obsolete ruby-gnome2 components
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 23:24 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:06 +0200 Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org wrote: # Hans de Graaff h...@gentoo.org (17 Apr 2012) You need to set ECHANGELOG_USER and then browse the tree to fix your ChangeLog entries. No, this is from the package.mask file where I typed this manually, and apparently I can't keep my email addresses apart :-( Now fixed, thanks for noticing. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree
El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 10:40 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 03:04 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would
be a way to compare eix outputs with ${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME} from bug
summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by
this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug
reports).
I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical
cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full
atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail.
Before that it was mayhem, and it's mainly the older bugs you appear be
worried about. Having a list of bugs to fix the cat/pkg for would have
more uses than the one you're interested in.
jer
I obviously agree, but both suggestions are not mutually exclusive I
think :)
This is another example I hit today:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247750
that would benefit from this QA report
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: sci-chemistry/gchemutils
I can be convinced to work on this again after goffice maintainers get new version in tree, but for now... # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (18 Apr 2012) # Fails to build according to bugs 348231 and 388509. # Needs a version bump but required goffice version is not # yet in Portage wrt bug 37. # Because of above mentioned bugs nsplugin support was removed # wrt bug 383147. # Removal in 30 days sci-chemistry/gchemutils-0.13.6
[gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed
Hi, I no longer use plymouth and have no more will to work on it, but because I believe many users use this package it would be good if somebody take maintainership of it. There's only one serious bug opened at this time and there's no much work with this package. I have also written some howto for users: http://dev.gentoo.org/~aidecoe/doc/en/plymouth.xml (Append .src to get the source.) You can move it anywhere you want. Plymouth has plugin I have written for OpenRC (see its openrc use flag) which is more proof-of-concept rather something to be used really seriously, therefore best would be to drop this plugin and support only systemd which is supported by upstream ootb. I'm happy to answer any question and help at the beginning with maintaining it. Cheers, -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 16:03:09 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: Hi, I no longer use plymouth and have no more will to work on it, but because I believe many users use this package it would be good if somebody take maintainership of it. I'll take it for now. Co-maintainers welcome. There's only one serious bug opened at this time and there's no much work with this package. I have also written some howto for users: http://dev.gentoo.org/~aidecoe/doc/en/plymouth.xml (Append .src to get the source.) You can move it anywhere you want. I guess this should go to the wiki. Plymouth has plugin I have written for OpenRC (see its openrc use flag) which is more proof-of-concept rather something to be used really seriously, therefore best would be to drop this plugin and support only systemd which is supported by upstream ootb. Works fine for me, so there's no point in dropping it in fear of systemd. -- Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org Gentoo Security/Ruby/Infrastructure signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed
Excerpts from Alex Legler's message of 2012-04-18 16:49:57 +0200: On Wednesday 18 April 2012 16:03:09 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: I no longer use plymouth and have no more will to work on it, but because I believe many users use this package it would be good if somebody take maintainership of it. I'll take it for now. Co-maintainers welcome. Thank you! There's only one serious bug opened at this time and there's no much work with this package. I have also written some howto for users: http://dev.gentoo.org/~aidecoe/doc/en/plymouth.xml (Append .src to get the source.) You can move it anywhere you want. I guess this should go to the wiki. I was asked in the past to move howto from wiki to some more reliable place, because wiki used to be offline quite often. Has this been changed? If you move it, please just know me the address so I can redirect users from the old one. Plymouth has plugin I have written for OpenRC (see its openrc use flag) which is more proof-of-concept rather something to be used really seriously, therefore best would be to drop this plugin and support only systemd which is supported by upstream ootb. Works fine for me, so there's no point in dropping it in fear of systemd. Hm… nice. :-) -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 17:01:28 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: I guess this should go to the wiki. I was asked in the past to move howto from wiki to some more reliable place, because wiki used to be offline quite often. Has this been changed? If you move it, please just know me the address so I can redirect users from the old one. I didn't mean the community wiki, but our own one (wiki.gentoo.org). -- Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org Gentoo Security/Ruby/Infrastructure signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Making user patches globally available
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: Funtoo has support for FEATURES=localpatch, which does the epatch_user thing before src_prepare. I think it should really go after src_prepare, in order to apply patches after those that src_prepare may apply (avoiding possible conflicts). So in some future EAPI, src_patch() will be run before src_prepare()? jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Making user patches globally available
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 12:59:13 Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: Funtoo has support for FEATURES=localpatch, which does the epatch_user thing before src_prepare. I think it should really go after src_prepare, in order to apply patches after those that src_prepare may apply (avoiding possible conflicts). So in some future EAPI, src_patch() will be run before src_prepare()? i don't think Zac mentioned PMS/EAPI anywhere ... just what Funtoo has done locally i'm not sure splitting patches out of src_prepare into a dedicated src_patch step would benefit that much. often times, you need to mangle the code before/after patching. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm
Dear All, I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well. it was masked on Apr 18, 2010, , | /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask | 31-# Raúl Porcel armi...@gentoo.org | 32-# Fails to build/work | 33-openexr | 34:ocamlopt ` Debian has arm port for ocamlopt since 3.12: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=ocaml-native-compilers I failed to find the changelog of ocaml, though :( How about unmasking it now? Yours, Benda
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: Dear All, I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well. it was masked on Apr 18, 2010, , | /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask | 31-# Raúl Porcel armi...@gentoo.org | 32-# Fails to build/work | 33-openexr | 34:ocamlopt ` Debian has arm port for ocamlopt since 3.12: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=ocaml-native-compilers I failed to find the changelog of ocaml, though :( How about unmasking it now? Yours, Benda Related: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340607
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 22:14:54 hero...@gentoo.org wrote: How about unmasking it now? file a bug for the arm team to request keywordings. we'll probably say yes. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
