Re: [gentoo-dev] remove cups from releases/make.defaults ?

2012-05-06 Thread Vaeth
On Sat, 5 May 2012, hasufell wrote: # grep ^USE /usr/portage/profiles/releases/make.defaults USE=acl cups gdbm gpm nptl nptlonly sysfs unicode This is used by /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/amd64/10.0 for example, so I have cups in default NON-DESKTOP profile like it was a mandatory

Re: [gentoo-dev] remove cups from releases/make.defaults ?

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/06/2012 04:58 AM, Ben wrote: On 6 May 2012 04:45, hasufellhasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep ^USE /usr/portage/profiles/releases/make.defaults USE=acl cups gdbm gpm nptl nptlonly sysfs unicode This is used by /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/amd64/10.0 for example, so I have cups in

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/emesene:0

2012-05-06 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (06 May 2012) # Stopped working long time ago. Removal in 30 days # Use emesene:2 as an alternative net-im/emesene:0 - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove ldap from desktop profiles use flags

2012-05-06 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/06/2012 03:04 AM, Ben wrote: On 6 May 2012 08:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: I mentioned this once a long time ago. We expect things to stay the same unless we do something to change them. If things change without us doing the

Re: [gentoo-dev] remove cups from releases/make.defaults ?

2012-05-06 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/06/2012 02:58 AM, Ben wrote: On 6 May 2012 04:45, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep ^USE /usr/portage/profiles/releases/make.defaults USE=acl cups gdbm gpm nptl nptlonly sysfs unicode This is used by

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

2012-05-06 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/06/2012 02:55 AM, Ben wrote: On 6 May 2012 08:34, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module IIRC

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove ldap from desktop profiles use flags

2012-05-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 06 May 2012 10:23:25 +0100 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/06/2012 03:04 AM, Ben wrote: On 6 May 2012 08:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: I mentioned this once a long time ago. We expect things to stay the

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

2012-05-06 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest the following description: Add support for the WebKit HTML

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove ldap from desktop profiles use flags

2012-05-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't think even heavyweight DE/WM usually needs ldap... Tend to agree. I don't think we want to create a new profile every time we want to change one of the flags. Some other questionable ones: emboss - Adds support for

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
eclass/ has a ChangeLog (and this is getting old that everyone keeps ignoring it, I've proposed punting the ChangeLog from eclass/ directory once, and repeating it now) On 05/06/2012 02:42 PM, Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote: grobian 12/05/06 11:42:07 Modified:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 06-05-2012 14:41:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: eclass/ has a ChangeLog (and this is getting old that everyone keeps ignoring it, I've proposed punting the ChangeLog from eclass/ directory once, and repeating it now) % head Changelog # ChangeLog for eclass directory # Copyright

Re: [gentoo-dev] remove cups from releases/make.defaults ?

2012-05-06 Thread Cyprien Nicolas
hasufell wrote: # grep ^USE /usr/portage/profiles/releases/make.defaults USE=acl cups gdbm gpm nptl nptlonly sysfs unicode I cannot find any description about 'nptlonly' and 'sysfs' in either /profiles/use{,.local}.desc. Are they still used? This is used by

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove ldap from desktop profiles use flags

2012-05-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 07:33 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió: On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't think even heavyweight DE/WM usually needs ldap... Tend to agree. I don't think we want to create a new profile every time we want to change one of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 14:41 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: eclass/ has a ChangeLog (and this is getting old that everyone keeps ignoring it, I've proposed punting the ChangeLog from eclass/ directory once, and repeating it now) Maybe we could punt ChangeLog from eclass/ and generate

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/06/2012 02:45 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 06-05-2012 14:41:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: eclass/ has a ChangeLog (and this is getting old that everyone keeps ignoring it, I've proposed punting the ChangeLog from eclass/ directory once, and repeating it now) % head Changelog #

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove ldap from desktop profiles use flags

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/06/2012 03:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 07:33 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió: On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Michał Górnymgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't think even heavyweight DE/WM usually needs ldap... Tend to agree. I don't think we want to create a new

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove ldap from desktop profiles use flags

2012-05-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 6 May 2012 07:33:59 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Some other questionable ones: emboss - Adds support for the European Molecular Biology Open We've had this discussion before... The question is not are people likely to want emboss?. The question is of people who use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by trapni need a co-maintainer

2012-05-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 17:09 +0200, Philipp Riegger escribió: On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:24:25 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/14/2012 02:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to add to metadata if you want.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-06 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras: On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2012, 14:03:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos: El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 14:41 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: eclass/ has a ChangeLog (and this is getting old that everyone keeps ignoring it, I've proposed punting the ChangeLog from eclass/ directory once, and repeating it now)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by trapni need a co-maintainer

2012-05-06 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Well, in tree versions are still buggy and outdated, I would vote for either: 1. Mask them for removal (server is already hardmasked, but client not). 2. Proxy maintain them if anyone volunteers. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 18:10 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2012, 14:03:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos: El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 14:41 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: eclass/ has a ChangeLog (and this is getting old that everyone keeps ignoring it, I've proposed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 06-05-2012 19:23:47 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 18:10 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: Maybe we could punt ChangeLogs generally and generate them from commit messages... err... hasn't this been discussed before? :o( Well, in this case I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: libtool.eclass

2012-05-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 19:28 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: On 06-05-2012 19:23:47 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 18:10 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: Maybe we could punt ChangeLogs generally and generate them from commit messages... err... hasn't this

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Andreas K Huettel wrote: I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called uno bridge. This is why I like the new category

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-06 Thread Luca Barbato
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/12 09:06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras: On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass: set default of CMAKE_VERBOSE=1

2012-05-06 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag 05 Mai 2012, 20:54:09 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2012, 18:30:10 schrieb hasufell: # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: CMAKE_VERBOSE # @DESCRIPTION: # Set to enable verbose messages during compilation. By default this is deactivated which is inconvenient imo and results

[gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
If you `vim foo.ebuild` the default template will automatically include lines for DEPEND and RDEPEND, but not for RESTRICT Therefore I suggest we move this example a bit down in skel.ebuild as it's more logical to continue with new lines instead of applying in-between Any objections? ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Michael Sterrett
I prefer it right after IUSE which is where it currently is in skel.ebuild.

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: If you `vim foo.ebuild` the default template will automatically include lines for DEPEND and RDEPEND, but not for RESTRICT Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or XEmacs, the template includes RESTRICT and places it

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/07/2012 01:27 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: If you `vim foo.ebuild` the default template will automatically include lines for DEPEND and RDEPEND, but not for RESTRICT Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or XEmacs,

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 05/07/2012 01:27 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or XEmacs, the template includes RESTRICT and places it before DEPEND and RDEPEND. I would rather see RESTRICT dropped from the

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Montag 07 Mai 2012, 01:24:39 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: On Mon, 07 May 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 05/07/2012 01:27 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Are we now using behaviour of editors as a reference? With Emacs or XEmacs, the template includes RESTRICT and places it before DEPEND and

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-05-06 23h59 UTC

2012-05-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2012-05-06 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-themes/qgtkstyle2012-04-30 14:27:28 pesa media-libs/tunepimp 2012-05-01 10:04:54 johu

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

2012-05-06 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

2012-05-06 Thread hasufell
On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

2012-05-06 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2012-05-07 03:00:31 hasufell napisał(a): On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

2012-05-06 Thread Ben
On 7 May 2012 08:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote: I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. I don't think that is necessary. Ben | yngwin

Re: [gentoo-dev] skel.ebuild cosmetics (move RESTRICT after DEPEND)

2012-05-06 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 06 May 2012 17:56:41 Michael Sterrett wrote: I prefer it right after IUSE which is where it currently is in skel.ebuild. this -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.