Long standing problem: Some of our most used license tags like GPL-2
are ambiguous, denoting either GPL-2 only or GPL-2 or later.
One solution would be license groups in ebuilds, which could be added
to EAPI 5 [1]. Disadvantage would be that they cannot be used in
previous EAPIs.
Alternatively,
On 10 May 2012 21:39, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
. Are there any other licenses
besides *GPL and FDL that would require such a file?
I'd welcome groups so we can have a Perl_5 group. The lions share of
modules published on CPAN are licensed Under the same license as Perl
5 Itself,
Greg KH schrieb:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:51:37PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
Please stop throwing lennartware at people. FailAudio has been enough,
thanks.
The use of these terms is both rude and totally uncalled for. You
should be ashamed of yourself.
Seriously, that's unacceptable
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Natanael Olaiz nol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here I attach a version that removes the eclass use.
I then replaced a eqmake4 for qmake. I don't know if there is a
better solution, but at least removes the deprecated eclass and
hopefully the mask (the live ebuild
On 10 May 2012 05:42, Natanael Olaiz nol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here I attach a version that removes the eclass use.
I then replaced a eqmake4 for qmake. I don't know if there is a
better solution, but at least removes the deprecated eclass and
hopefully the mask (the live ebuild is newer).
On 05/10/2012 04:44 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Greg KH schrieb:
No one forces you to use any of this software if you do not want to.
There are lots of other operating systems out there, feel free to switch
to them if you do not like the way this one is working out, no one is
Hi,
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 06:34 +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
I think expressing my own opinion about Lennart-made software is my
right, after all.
I would express my opinion about Fabio made software, but I've never
heard of any.
Firstly, it's almost impossible nowadays to avoid including
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:23:48AM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
Jim?
Sorry, I am behind on my gentoo-dev reading, thanks Matt for bringing
this thread to my attention. Here are the two main concerns I've
gathered from the rest of the thread:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:04:08PM -0600, Ryan Hill
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:10:48PM -0400, Jim Ramsay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:06:45PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
wouldnt adding a sse2 useflag and putting it in REQUIRED_USE solve the
problem ?
afaik portage wont even try to upgrade if people have -sse2
This is an
Greg KH wrote:
No one forces you to use any of this software if you do not want to.
There are lots of other operating systems out there, feel free to switch
to them if you do not like the way this one is working out, no one is
stopping you.
Or alternatively, the people who hate Unix could move
Am 09.05.2012 15:47, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
our glibc versions long ago stopped working with linux-2.4 due to NPTL being
required. further, we've long set the min kernel version to 2.6.9 in the
ebuild itself. so bumping it to 2.6.16 isn't a stretch.
the driving force here is that glibc
On 05/10/2012 11:57 AM, David Leverton wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
No one forces you to use any of this software if you do not want to.
There are lots of other operating systems out there, feel free to switch
to them if you do not like the way this one is working out, no one is
stopping you.
Or
Zac Medico wrote:
Isn't it presumptuous to say that they hate Unix? Maybe their vision of
how they'd like Unix to be is just different from yours?
If how they'd like Unix to be goes so blatantly against its
fundamental design principles then I think it's reasonable to say that
they hate it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/09/2012 07:51 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
I foresee a new udev fork then. If udev is going to end up like
avahi is, this is *highly* probable.
With avahi is ... I actually mean, one single tarball blob
depending on the whole world and its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:55:02 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Make a constructive criticism if you really need to rant about
software that nobody forces you to use.
Not that I agree with anything Fabio has ever said, but I believe
On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:59:40 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:55:02 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Make a constructive criticism if you really need to rant about
software
On Thu, 10 May 2012 22:13:33 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:55:02 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Make a constructive criticism if you really need to rant about
software that nobody forces you to use.
Not that I agree with
On Thu, 10 May 2012 21:14:33 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 22:13:33 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:55:02 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Make a constructive criticism if you really
Hi,
El 05/10/2012 03:07 PM, Ben escribió:
On 10 May 2012 05:42, Natanael Olaiz nol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here I attach a version that removes the eclass use.
[...]
Please check the comments on bug #380589.
A new ebuild needs to:
- use qt4-r2.eclass and EAPI=4
- be compatible with Qt
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I sincerely hope someone has hacked into your account and he is
writing on your behalf. This sort of trash talk does not belong to a
public Gentoo mailing list. Make a
On Thursday 10 May 2012 15:01:06 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 09.05.2012 15:47, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
our glibc versions long ago stopped working with linux-2.4 due to NPTL
being required. further, we've long set the min kernel version to 2.6.9
in the ebuild itself. so bumping it to 2.6.16
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think expressing my own opinion about Lennart-made software is my
right, after all.
Firstly, it's almost impossible nowadays to avoid including avahi,
systemd and pulseaudio into a desktop distro so, there is no real
Fabio Erculiani posted on Thu, 10 May 2012 22:48:29 +0200 as excerpted:
On a side note, I find it quite odd to be accused of trash talking by
Linux Kernel people.
hwoarang is a kernel person?
If you note, gregkh didn't post that. I can't agree with udev/systemd
integration, but it's worth
Duncan posted on Fri, 11 May 2012 00:59:22 + as excerpted:
Fabio Erculiani posted on Thu, 10 May 2012 22:48:29 +0200 as excerpted:
On a side note, I find it quite odd to be accused of trash talking by
Linux Kernel people.
hwoarang is a kernel person?
FWIW, I see the gregkh post you
24 matches
Mail list logo
