# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (16 May 2012)
# Internal copy of vulnerable dev-libs/expat wrt #250930,
# CVE-2009-{3720,3560} and CVE-2012-{0876,1147,1148}.
#
# Fails to compile wrt bug #368089
# Bad migration away from dev-python/pyxml wrt #367745
#
# Removal in 30 days.
I implemented this feature in Entropy long time ago (2009 iirc) and
enabled it by default as well.
We never had a single issue. Users seem quite happy about it.
So yeah, go for it!
--
Fabio Erculiani
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
+1 very good idea
The best thing about it is not having to worry about missing an important
change in a file I DO change, due to all the noise
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
Yes, please!
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
+1 very good idea
Hmm, does that mean that when a default changes in (or some new setting
is
On 16-05-2012 12:36:03 +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
+1 very good idea
Hmm, does that mean
El mié, 16-05-2012 a las 11:42 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió:
On 16-05-2012 12:36:03 +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
+1 very good idea
Hmm,
On 2012-05-16 12:56 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
Generally, several PMS (I think apt does it as well) make this assumption:
if config file C owned by package P has never been modified, meaning
that md5 or whatever is the same, the old C of P was fine, so is the
new C.
Yep, and I always thought
On 16-05-2012 11:48:20 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 16-05-2012 a las 11:42 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió:
On 16-05-2012 12:36:03 +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
I implemented this feature in Entropy long time ago (2009 iirc) and
enabled it by default as well.
We never had a single issue. Users seem quite happy about it.
This is also the default behavior with the cfg-update
On 05/16/2012 10:40 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (16 May 2012)
# Internal copy of vulnerable dev-libs/expat wrt #250930,
# CVE-2009-{3720,3560} and CVE-2012-{0876,1147,1148}.
#
# Fails to compile wrt bug #368089
# Bad migration away from dev-python/pyxml
On 05/16/2012 10:31 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 05/16/2012 10:40 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org (16 May 2012)
# Internal copy of vulnerable dev-libs/expat wrt #250930,
# CVE-2009-{3720,3560} and CVE-2012-{0876,1147,1148}.
#
# Fails to compile wrt bug
On 13 May 2012 07:43, Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote:
* Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:33:18PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
{ term: { status:latest} },
{ term: {
On 13 May 2012 07:43, Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote:
* Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:33:18PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
{ term: { status:latest} },
{ term: {
# Michael Sterrett mr_bon...@gentoo.org (16 May 2012)
# doesn't work with latest ode and last release in 2003.
# Masked for removal on 20120615
games-arcade/ssc
Greg KH wrote:
Steven J Long wrote:
And that is what we were discussing: possible future coupling between the
two, which is much easier to do when the sources are part of the
same package.
..
OFC you could just assure us that udev will never rely on systemd as a
design decision. I can
Alec Warner wrote:
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think expressing my own opinion about Lennart-made software is my
right, after all.
Firstly, it's almost impossible nowadays to avoid including avahi,
systemd and pulseaudio into a desktop distro so, there is no real
choice. This
William Hubbs wrote:
I'm wondering the same thing since once busybox 1.20.0 hits stable you
will be able to have a separate /usr without an initramfs quite easily
if that's what you want to do.
When you emerge this version of busybox with the sep-usr use flag, you
get a binary in / called
19 matches
Mail list logo
