Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org writes:
My main concern is that many people probably have sys-boot/grub in
@world.
How about a news item advising people to put sys-boot/grub:0 in their
world file to retain grub:0?
If grub:2 is made visible, portage will install it, and will remove
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:35:19 -0400
Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 06/25/2012 12:15 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I
would like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it
hits the tree. I don't do much work on base
neither stable tdb-1.2.9 nor tdb-1.2.10 install any shared library
when build with distcc, because of a failing chech @ configure time
Checking for building library support: not found
setting MAKEOPTS=-j1 does not suffice FEATURES=-distcc is needed
FYI the check is inside
Open a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ instead of mailing here.
Yeah, I know bugzilla is down but it's only temporary.
- Samuli
On 06/25/2012 02:54 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
neither stable tdb-1.2.9 nor tdb-1.2.10 install any shared library
when build with distcc, because of a failing chech @
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (25 Jun 2012)
# Replaced by the new 1.0.0 release of x11-apps/transset.
# Removal in 30 days.
x11-misc/transset-df
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
advice on
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
older version. Even if it removes the older one, everything necessary
is installed into /boot and the MBR already.
Portage will remove the older slot the
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:15:59 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the
tree. I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like
some advice
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:15:59 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the
tree. I
On 06/25/2012 06:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 23/06/12 08:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/10/2012 11:18 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/10/2012 05:25 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 Zac Medico
zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
A dependency atom will have optional SLOT
Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:56:25 -0400 as excerpted:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
older version. Even if it removes the older one, everything necessary
is installed
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:56:25 -0400 as excerpted:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
older
I'm not sure if you're supposed to announce these things or not, so here goes.
The app-doc herd will maintain packages in app-doc/ that don't otherwise
have a maintainer. Most of this stuff is either static or updated
infrequently by script, but if you're interested feel free to join.
Because
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:43:47 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:56:25 -0400 as excerpted:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:13:09 -0400 as excerpted:
Profiles do not set a default bootloader so I have no idea what you
are talking about.
I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that was
a part of @system and that thus would have likely had a default
On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:58:13 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:03 PM, hasufell wrote:
So, I will file a documentation bug unless someone can point me in
the right direction. I didn't find a reference to that issue.
Open a bug, write a devmanual patch and I
Ryan Hill posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:57:30 -0600 as excerpted:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:58:13 +0100 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:03 PM, hasufell wrote:
So, I will file a documentation bug unless someone can point me in
the right direction. I didn't find a
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (26 Jun 2012)
# Dead upstream. QA problems in ebuild. Still uses old
# ruby.eclass. Use dev-ruby/memcache-client instead.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/Ruby-MemCache
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
18 matches
Mail list logo
