[gentoo-dev] Re: vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

Pacho Ramos posted on Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:02:47 +0200 as excerpted: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 09:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos >> wrote: >> > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: >> > > Revised to use a separ

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 03:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I don't expect we would be modifying older EAPIs , any usage of IUSE etc within phase functions for those EAPIs would remain undefined imo; the audit is just to determine what portage (optionally other P

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 03:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:22:43 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 02:24 >> PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:23:51 -0400 Ia

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:22:43 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > On 20/09/12 02:24 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:23:51 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > > wrote: > >> I'm biased, so to me

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 02:24 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:23:51 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: >> I'm biased, so to me just auditing what portage does would be >> good enough. :D > > You also need to audit what Portage did since EAPI 0

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 18:55 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:54:43 +0200 >> Pacho Ramos wrote: >> > That isn't necessary what could occur if the behavior changes >> > unexpectedly: as current behavior is already be

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:23:51 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > I'm biased, so to me just auditing what portage does would be good > enough. :D You also need to audit what Portage did since EAPI 0 was introduced. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -BEGIN PGP SI

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 02:12 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Pacho Ramos > wrote: >> El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 10:14 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 20/09/12 09:52 AM, C

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:13:00 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 18:55 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:54:43 +0200 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > That isn't necessary what could occur if the behavior changes > > > unexpectedly: as current behavior is alre

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:02:47 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > > We had this discussion when the function was introduced. It's > > supposed to be used for cosmetic things only. > > What are "cosmetics" things? Also, what do you mean by "It's > supposed"? Who should decide what "is supposed" and what not

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 18:55 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:54:43 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > That isn't necessary what could occur if the behavior changes > > unexpectedly: as current behavior is already being assumed in > > eclasses/ebuilds, portage couldn't chang

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 10:14 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 20/09/12 09:52 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:13:40 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius >> > wrote: >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 09:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > > > Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead > > > of reading IUSE, as sug

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 10:14 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 20/09/12 09:52 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:13:40 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > > wrote: > >> PMS may not need to be fixed, just the spec > > > > PMS is

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:54:43 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > That isn't necessary what could occur if the behavior changes > unexpectedly: as current behavior is already being assumed in > eclasses/ebuilds, portage couldn't change it without, before, porting > ebuilds/eclasses to use that new hypotheti

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:52:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > The problem is that I suspect that, maybe, this behavior was present > and supported even in eapi0 It wasn't. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 14:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:13:40 -0400 > Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > PMS may not need to be fixed, just the spec > > PMS is the spec, and it doesn't need fixing, since it accurately

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 09:13 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 20/09/12 03:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos > > wrote: > > > >> El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 03:33 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 08:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > > > Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead of > > > reading IUSE, as s

[gentoo-dev] RFC: method of checking for cross compilation from ebuild functions

I'm working on some EAPI extensions with the goal of making Portage more powerful for cross-compilation. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317337 Currently, it's come down to the following: - A new dependency type HDEPEND for packages which must be installed in / at build time. With HDEP

[gentoo-dev] EAPI 5 approved

Today, the Gentoo Council has approved the specification for EAPI 5 in a vote by e-mail. You can get the text via app-doc/pms (as soon as a new ebuild hits the mirrors) or from the git repository. The gitweb for the PMS can be found here: For

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 10:26 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:14:32 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: >> And, for support to be official for ebuilds or eclasses to query >> IUSE (or other globals) within phase functions, then the 'spec' >> (PM

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:14:32 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > And, for support to be official for ebuilds or eclasses to query IUSE > (or other globals) within phase functions, then the 'spec' (PMS) is > probably all that needs to be 'fixed'. Right?

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 09:52 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:13:40 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: >> PMS may not need to be fixed, just the spec > > PMS is the spec, and it doesn't need fixing, since it accurately > reflects the situatio

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:13:40 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > PMS may not need to be fixed, just the spec PMS is the spec, and it doesn't need fixing, since it accurately reflects the situation we're dealing with. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -BEGIN PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/09/12 03:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos > wrote: > >> El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev >> escribió: >>> Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag >>> ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > > Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead > > of reading IUSE, as suggested by Ciaran McCreesh. As a result of > > this change, vala.eclass now

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > > Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead > > of reading IUSE, as suggested by Ciaran McCreesh. As a result of > > this change, vala.eclass no

Re: [gentoo-dev] vala.eclass: change vala_src_prepare behavior when USE=-vala

On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 08:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > > Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead of > > reading IUSE, as suggested by Ciaran McCreesh. As a result of this > > change, vala.eclass now