On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:40 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts?
+1. I had a server become inaccessible recently because I took down
one of the interfaces and it took sshd down with it. That's because
there's also a problematic interaction with
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:12:55 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:54:21PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:15:43 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a trick to this; currently, those generated scripts hardcode
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:37:13 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Offhand... and this makes it a bit more complex, but still tenuable
imo, but we could get around this via shoving the symlink pathway into
the shebang itself.
scenario 1:
Script gets installed for 2.7, 3.1, 3.2;
I'm cooking up some eclass functions and it occurred to me that perhaps
I had some responsibility regarding EAPI4's new error handling
semantics. After looking into it, it seems that, superficially, the
answer to my question is no, the EAPI4 changes only apply to ebuild
helpers.
Even so,
On 10/19/2012 07:23 AM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
I'm cooking up some eclass functions and it occurred to me that perhaps
I had some responsibility regarding EAPI4's new error handling
semantics. After looking into it, it seems that, superficially, the
answer to my question is no, the EAPI4
El jue, 18-10-2012 a las 15:35 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I see no major difficult in moving to eapi4, what exact
difficult are you (I mean people still sticking with eapi0/1) seeing?
It is harder than cp.
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:21:52 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
What I am trying to say is that, if we agree latest eapi is
technically better, we need to try to get it used when possible (I
mean, when, for example, eclasses are ported) for a QA reasoning.
i think we all agree
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 14:51 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:21:52 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
What I am trying to say is that, if we agree latest eapi is
technically better, we need to try to get it used when possible (I
mean, when, for
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:09:15 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 14:51 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:21:52 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
What I am trying to say is that, if we agree latest eapi is
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
I don't really see the advantage or
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 15:47 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
[...]
Because it will add even more work, I mean:
- I catch a package using and old eapi and, then, still not passing
--disable-silent-rules option. = First problem, I need to notice that
package, there are packages I simply
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
I dont know any such requirement from english nor german and neither do
i see any
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
I volunteer to do whatever conversions you want for every ebuild I find
if I have time... what prevents me from doing it is to commit that
changes to ebuilds not maintained by me and not knowing if developers
agree on using latest eapi if possible. A more general solution
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 21:43 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
I volunteer to do whatever conversions you want for every ebuild I find
if I have time... what prevents me from doing it is to commit that
changes to ebuilds not maintained by me and not knowing if developers
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 21:01 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
In English, it is also mandatory to end sentences in .
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:01:57 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
In my opinion, descriptions should not be sentences. Sentences
in English
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
El vie, 19-10-2012 a las 21:43 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
I volunteer to do whatever conversions you want for every ebuild I find
if I have time... what prevents me from doing it is to commit that
changes to ebuilds not maintained by me and not
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:53:18 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Seriously, what people is still having problems with handling eapi4?
If there are doubts about its usage, they should be asked and resolved
instead of ignored keeping ebuilds with older eapis. The only eapi
that probably
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is not about having problems with handling eapi-X, this is just
about limited time and the choice where to spend that time. If you do
just a version bump, you often dont have to touch the ebuild at all,
just copy,
Il 19/10/2012 21:36, Thomas Sachau ha scritto:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
I dont know any such requirement from
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sentences in English not only need to end with a dot but also require a
subject
and a predicate.
Another repoman check? And don't forget the topic for Japanese.
ducks
22 matches
Mail list logo
